Friday, November 30, 2007

Ascribing Republican motive for breaking the budget deal

The screaming over the service taxes is loud, indeed.

Apparently Bishop and Dillon are going at it on talk radio in Detroit, and they hit the TV over here in Grand Rapids. Cropsey and Schauer went at it on Walt Sorg's show, Alan never letting Mark get a word in edgewise.

The laughable thing (if there is such a thing here) is how the Republicans are trying to hit on the fact that the House isn't in session; this comes after all the times they bugged out this year, saying they didn't need to be there if there wasn't an agreement to vote on. Dillon can have the House back in a heartbeat- making that talking point yet another diversion, but they sure are banging that drum as loud as they can.

Whatever.

I'm not going to lay this all out again. The service taxes came about because of the Senate Republicans. If you need the back story, just check my diaries and read back. The Senate Republicans seem intent on turning this into a negotiation to BREAK A DEAL they made in the first place - something that is getting lost in all the racket. Hello, media? Want to report that?

The question now becomes- why are they breaking this deal. What possible reason could they have for upsetting their own base? The answer comes in a tidy package from MIRS-

The answer is there are enough people on both sides of the aisle who would like to see the service tax start up.

Many Republicans are licking their chops to ride the anti-tax fervor to a November 2008 victory. They're looking at a triple threat by backing the effort of Oakland County Executive L. Brooks PATTERSON to get a repeal on the ballot and bring out the base. Many R's think the proposal will put them over the top to take back the House. And it will swing Michigan red in the presidential election.


Because that worked so well in 2006? Ohhh-kay. Carry on.

For the Democrats on holding strong- the reason is fiscal responsibility.

Meanwhile, a lot of Democrats would rather go with the devil they know a little better than the devil they don't. They feel they've got a deal already negotiated on Sept. 30 and aren't inclined to go for a bill that could blow a $380 million hole in this year's budget and will sunset before Michigan makes a full economic recovery.


Let's recap. Republicans want something to yell about next year, Democrats want to put Michigan on solid ground. That is why there is no deal.

And there is also this- seems a certain pink pig is hungry.

"It's helpful," said Drolet, the ringleader of several recall efforts against tax-supporting lawmakers statewide. "Or, let's put it this way — what happened yesterday was a tragedy for everyone except moving companies and Michigan recalls."

Reportedly, Drolet's war chest to aid in legislative recall efforts has become fuller in recent weeks as business owners reacted to the overall service tax snafu. Drolet is targeting lawmakers who voted to increase the income tax or expand the use tax to services.


Could it be that Republicans are holding up this replacement simply because they want to help drive the recalls and create a ballot issue for 2008? Given all the flipping and flopping they have done on this issue, at this point it's a fair bet.

Read more...

House coming back tonight?

(UPDATE 8:30 PM: All quiet on the news front, but I can tell you that they are still in Lansing- they are hitting this blog. Maybe something will get settled tonight...)


Look! It's Friday! And here comes an agreement! Maybe!

So, disregard all speculation below (but certainly keep it in mind for future reference), this now breaking on MIRS-

In the mad scramble to find a way to stop the state's six-cent sales tax from being spread to a variety of allegedly non-essential services in roughly 12 hours, lawmakers and the executive office are exploring several possibilities this morning, including the House reversing course and calling a special session for 6 p.m.

Asked about the seriousness of lawmakers and Granholm to find an alternative to the service tax before midnight that all sides agree to, Bishop said, "We wouldn't be here with a snowstorm coming if we're not making progress."


Bishop still finds a way to whine.

Disregarding the MIRS bias - adding the words "allegedly non-essential" to the description of services and suggesting that it's the House that has to "reverse course" - perhaps this will get done after all.

But what will Brooks do next year? Won't someone think of Patterson?

I have some nice brochures of Florida. Maybe I'll send them along. (And I readily admit my bias. Deal with it.)

Read more...

Thursday, November 29, 2007

Is it Friday yet?

Andy Dillon has learned his lesson.

Dillon said based on his experience with Senate Republicans in past budget negotiations, they would not compromise until they hit a deadline. He said the House version was Democrats' last best offer. Democrats and Republicans accused one another of walking out of negotiations Wednesday evening.


Mike Bishop was shocked! shocked I tell you! that the tables were finally turned.

"Have you ever seen anything like this? I know I haven't," Bishop said after the House vote. "For them to just bolt and go home is cowardice, especially after all the time we spent negotiating today."


Um... let me think... why, yes. Yes I have seen something like this before. Matter of fact, the Senate Democrats were so frustrated that the Republicans walked out one day in September that they actually pulled out a camera and filmed the empty chamber. So spare us the faux outrage and name-calling, OK, Mike? This is actually quite common.

A brief recap of yesterday. Late afternoon, the Senate Republicans put what MIRS said was their "final offer on the table". When the words "final offer" or "last opportunity" are used, usually you think that's it, right? Turns out Republicans weren't really serious when they said that; they considered the negotiations still open.

Republican Sen. Jud Gilbert of Algonac, a key negotiator on the service tax bill, said on the House floor: "I'm stunned. We were negotiating with them and they walked down here and did this."


They tried a bully tactic and it backfired. The House stood up for responsibility...

"We passed a proposal that was supported by the business community, one that protects funding for education, health care and public safety," Bird said. "There hasn't been a genuine willingness to compromise, and we have passed our plan."


... and they left the gape-jawed Republicans in the dust. Republicans immediately rejected being responsible, of course, and started clamoring for them to come back and play some more.

The Senate rejected the House plan along mostly partisan lines, and called for a conference committee to work out differences, possibly today. Senate Republicans sent a request to House Speaker Andy Dillon, R-Redford Township, to call the House back to an emergency session Friday to try again to replace the service tax.


Republicans are still insisting on a sunset and one-time gimmicks, which breaks the budget deal and leaves our future shaky. Why not let a future legislative body decide whether to repeal the amount? Good question, one that no one seems willing to ask.

Instead, we cue the noise machine in the form of the disingenuous Tricia Kinley, who used the word "shocking" and pointed fingers at the House (didn't know the Michigan Chamber of Commerce was a partisan outfit, did you? ha ha), and cue the rumors that the Republicans are doing this just so Brooks Patterson will have something to yell about as he starts yet another budget destructing petition drive next year. The House Democrats stood up, and the Republicans and their puppet-masters don't quite know what to do about it yet.

When you get past all the noise, the fact is that the Senate Republicans are responsible for this service tax going forward. They know what needs to be done, they refuse to do it, and more of your time and tax dollars will be wasted on their game.

But it isn't Friday yet, so we will see how loud the screaming gets in the next 48 hours. Stand tough, Speaker Dillon.

Read more...

Payback? Republicans remove Schauer from committee

This hasn't hit the news yet, here is the link to the Senate Journal- Mike Bishop today removed Mark Schauer from the Campaign & Elections Oversight Committee.

This committee is headed by Michelle McManus. Just recently, McManus wrote a letter to the Detroit Free Press blaming Senator Schauer and the Democrats for killing the chances of adding the missing four back to the primary ballot.

Senator Schauer responded to Michelle's accusations, telling us what really happened and why the Senate Democrats did what they did. He ended it with this-

It's ironic that a member of a party that canceled its primary election in 2004 now portrays Republicans as advocates for increased participation. If McManus and Republicans were serious about removing roadblocks to voting, they would take action on a number of election reforms pursued by Democrats for years.

McManus is right about one thing: Michigan deserves better -- better than a Campaign and Election Oversight Committee chairperson who spends more time trying to score partisan points than pursuing reform.


And today, he finds himself booted off the committee.

Now, it could be this, it could be that Mark has been outspoken about election reform and the Republicans are embarrassed that they haven't addressed it, it could be the service tax issue, who knows with these guys.

Given the Senate Republicans proclivity to lash out at anyone who dares stand up to them, my guess is this is payback for Senator Schauer having the guts to call them out on their misbehavior. Which Republican misbehavior is still unclear. There are so many to choose from.

More to follow...

Read more...

Wednesday, November 28, 2007

NFL Week 12 Results




Green Bay 37, Detroit 26


Dallas 34, N.Y. Jets 3


Indianapolis 31, Atlanta 13


Jacksonville 36, Buffalo 14


Cleveland 27, Houston 17


Minnesota 41, N.Y. Giants 17


New Orleans 31, Carolina 6


Oakland 20, Kansas City 17


Seattle 24, St. Louis 19


Cincinnati 35, Tennessee 6


Tampa Bay 19, Washington 13


San Francisco 37, Arizona 31 (OT)


San Diego 32, Baltimore 14


Chicago 37, Denver 34 (OT)


New England 31, Philadelphia 28


Pittsburgh 3, Miami 0



11-5.



112-64.



Picking Green Bay for tomorrow night, will do the rest later...

Read more...

Senate Republicans still insist on breaking budget deal

UPDATE: Andy tells them to stuff it. See this comment for details.

Just another day in Lansing. Republicans obstructing. Going back on their word. But what else is new.

Republicans say the tax increase should be temporary and end in 2011, though they made an offer Wednesday to end the tax in 2012 instead. But Democrats, including Gov. Jennifer Granholm, want it to be permanent because there was an agreement to make the tax on services permanent, and they say they don't want to plunge the state back into another budget crisis down the road.


The income tax starts to sunset in 2011. But hey, why screw up only one budget year when you can screw up two, right?

And they still want to use yet another one-time fix.

The sides also disagree over the size of the surcharge and whether to replace all the $750 million that would be generated each year by the service tax. Republicans think some of the money can be replaced with extra, one-time revenue generated by switching to the MBT, but Democrats would rather that money be saved in Michigan's rainy day fund.


And according to the AP and MIRS, this is their final offer.

In a letter to House Speaker Andy Dillon, D-Redford, Republicans who control the Senate said their new offer — which would keep some money in the rainy day fund and raise the MBT surcharge a bit — represents the "last opportunity" to avoid implementing the service tax.


I almost hate to mention this next bit of info- but check this out. They were talking of adding the Dems back to the ballot if we would just vote on extending their time in office.

According to four sources with knowledge of the discussions, key lawmakers of both parties in Lansing had discussed a deal that would have involved restoring the Democrats to the ballot and setting up a referendum on easing the state's legislative term limits. That would have required moving the primary from Jan. 15 to Jan. 29, in order to meet requirements for at least 60 days' notice before a statewide referendum.


Gee, I wonder what the outcome of that would be at this point.

Maybe some other time. Thanks for asking though.

Read more...

Tuesday, November 27, 2007

It's all about Michelle

Did you have to work the Tuesday before Thanksgiving? Michelle McManus did, and she wasn't happy about it.

McManus was clearly tired of taking blame for the service tax and what has become months of budget emergencies. An allegation by Granholm that legislators were not tending to fiscal problems agitated her.

"I have never been in session on the Tuesday before Thanksgiving. I'm getting a little tired of the governor and her propaganda," she said.


The heart aches, doesn't it? Poor Michelle had to interrupt her third two-week vacation this year to be at work and fix the problem that the Senate Republicans brought about in the first place.

Of course, instead of fixing it, they just blew it all up again, reneging on the budget deal and presenting a bill that they knew wouldn't pass muster with the House or Granholm.

But hey, it's not Michelle's problem. She just goes back to blaming the governor, the typical fallback position when a Senate Republican is trying to dodge responsibility.

"I didn't come up with the service tax. I didn't vote for it. That was (Granholm's) caucus. I'm a little perturbed that she thinks it's my problem," added McManus.


Well, no, actually we have learned from MIRS that this was Valde Garcia's idea, it originated back in April, he spent the summer trying to work something out, and in the end it was a bipartisan agreement that put it in place.

Garcia said he talked with a bipartisan group of about a dozen representatives and senators leading up to the showdown in late September. During that fateful, final weekend, Garcia said there were about four members of the informal service tax caucus, though he refused to name names.


Things get dicey after that, with Garcia "taking credit for the tax going forward", and Marsden immediately trying to blame Dillon for tie-barring it to the income tax, which, of course, was necessary for any of this to work out.

Doesn't matter. It isn't Michelle's problem. Can't be bothered with such things.

McManus sure did like to spend the money though. Just check the record at Michigan Votes. But for some reason she was "baffled and frustrated" when something was cut in her district.

You can see why McManus would get a little perturbed. Here she is spending the money, and now she is being asked to find a way to pay for it! During her vacation!

Shame on you, Democrats. This fiscal responsibility stuff is getting old, don't you think?

Read more...

Senate Republicans won't take up primary bill

Senate Republicans slam the door on adding those names back to the ballot- and that seems to be that, as far as the Democrats and the primary are concerned, anyway.

Ron Paul, anyone?

Senate Republicans have decided not to take up the presidential primary bill passed Monday by the House, meaning New York Sen. Hillary Clinton likely will be the only top Democratic candidate on the Jan. 15 ballot.

The Democrat-controlled House approved a measure late Monday that would permit the Secretary of State to place on the ballot the names of all Democratic candidates actively campaigning for the White House.

-snip-

"This is an intra-party fight and Senate Republicans will not get involved," said Matt Marsden, spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Mike Bishop, R-Rochester, shortly before the Senate adjourned this morning. "We'll move forward with our primary on Jan. 15 and let the Democrats do theirs behind closed doors if that's what they want."


What will the Democrats finally decide to do? According to MIRS, that decision is coming tonight.

Take your time. We'll be here.

UPDATE: From the AP- and I'm not sure I trust anything Mike Bishop says- comes this interesting bit of information-

Bishop said some of the Democratic candidates threatened to sue if their names were restored to the ballot.


Sure would like to know the names, wouldn't you?

UPDATE 2: Now the AP says that Saturday is the drop-dead date.

Dingell blames the Edwards people. Saul blames the Edwards people and Mark Brewer. Brewer says the four made a "conscious decision" to stay off the ballot and he didn't scuttle anything, and he will abide by what the executive committee decision is, but that can change right up until the time he files Saturday with the DNC. Everything clear now?

Read more...

Grand Rapids Goes Green

Today, the city of Grand Rapids hit its goal of buying 20% of its electricity from "green sources" by 2008 by becoming the biggest customer of Consumers Energy's Green Generation program.

The Press article was written before the vote, but I just watched it on TV- and the vote was unanimous. Much praise heaped on Governor Granholm for her leadership on this issue, Mayor Heartwell for setting this goal, Robert Dean for his work before he left for Lansing, the people at Consumers for their help... and on down the line. City Commissioners are very happy to be doing this.

Mayor George Heartwell said the cost of buying "green" power will be offset by conservation measures the city utilities have taken in the past year.

"Nobody is going to see their water or sewer bill increase because we are purchasing green power," Heartwell said. The city's water and sewer system serves about 67,000 customers in Grand Rapids and 11 suburbs.


This was done with the idea of urging on our legislators to adopt a renewable portfolio standard. If the second biggest city in Michigan can do it- certainly the state can, too.

Heartwell hopes the deal with Consumers Energy will set an example for state legislators, who have resisted efforts to buy 15 percent of the state's energy from renewable sources.


Grand Rapids worked out a deal with Consumers to make this economically feasible, and found ways to conserve money to offset the cost of this program.

The city negotiated a discount rate that will allow it to buy 9,234 "blocks" of green energy a month for $1.50 per block.

The city's discount rate was approved by the Michigan Public Service Commission earlier this month for large customers who agree to purchase more than 8,000 "blocks" per month.


We now will be Consumers biggest customer for Green Generation. 11,200 customers have signed up, you can too. Follow that link. Where does most of this energy come from?

Ninety-five percent of Consumers Energy's green energy comes from "biomass" generators that are fueled by methane gases from landfills, Pietryga said. The remainder comes from wind power sources.


Yes, the trash. This is energy that is produced right here in the state.

WTG Grand Rapids. So proud of my (not so) little town.

Read more...

Monday, November 26, 2007

Dillon takes the tax fight to the Detroit News

It's almost enough to make a grown woman weep tears of joy. Seriously. The House Democrats have found their spine on the replacement for the service taxes, and I couldn't be happier with the tone they are taking.

Today, Andy Dillon goes beyond the simple House press release and calls out the Senate Republicans in an op-ed for the News- the place where it needs to be seen the most.

First, he points out the fiscal problem with the Senate Republican plan-

The Senate plan proposes significant changes to the Michigan Business Tax -- which was signed into law in July -- but replaces only $400 million in revenue per year, leaving a more than $300 million hole in the state budget in 2009 and 2010.

In addition, the plan has a sunset date of 2011, after which there will be a gaping hole of more than $700 million in the state budget.

This plan ignores the reality that Michigan will be in dire straits again in just a few years if it goes into effect. It shows a complete lack of foresight and planning, and is nothing more than a short-term fix that will have long-term repercussions for the people of Michigan.


And then a beautiful segue into the irresponsible nature of it all-

Interestingly enough, when the plan sunsets in 2011, 17 of 21 Republicans in the Senate will be ineligible to run for office again because of term limits. The very people who created the problem are punting it to their successors, showing a stunning display of irresponsible and partisan leadership.

This is the same mentality that led Michigan straight into the fiscal crisis that House Democrats have been trying to resolve all year long. It is unacceptable that the Senate Republicans have knocked the current budget out of balance and set Michigan up to fall into a giant black hole in 2011, when they won't be around to deal with the consequences.


Of course. Does the name John Engler ring a bell?

I'll go the Speaker one better - this is simply a continuation of the pattern that Senate Republicans have followed all year long, and that is one of delay and obstruction.

Who skipped out on meetings? Who insisted on vacations? Who tried to drive a wedge between the House and Governor Granholm? Who flat-out lied about a budget deal? Who ignored all the other legislation and issues and used the budget as an excuse? Who did everything they could to drag out this process with endless requests for continuations? The press likes to gloss over this and lump them all in the same category of ineptitude, but some people been paying attention. You can't sum it up better than this next statement- follow over the flip for the answer...

Take it away, Markos.

In his first Inaugural Address, Ronald Reagan remarked that "government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem." While the quip has provided Republicans with a cheap slogan for two decades, the philosophy behind it is beginning to box them in. If they govern effectively, they invalidate their own antigovernment ideology. And when you elect people who believe that government won't work, you shouldn't be surprised when government stops working.


Inevitably the Republicans are going to cry "you're just being partisan!", like they somehow aren't, or something, to which I would say, "hell yes, I'm being partisan, because that is where the problem originates". We've got the record. So bring it. It's just another excuse to avoid dealing with the failure of the Republican anti-government philosophy.

And here is why I’ve yelled so much about all of this during the year- the consequences have been dire as far as public opinion goes, and I knew it was coming. Because the press ignores the obvious problem and fails to point out the nuance, this week a new poll from EPIC is going to show some horrible numbers on approval ratings for all involved. The Republicans have dragged down the entire state government with their obstruction, and I believe that is exactly what they wanted to have happen.

They need things to be bad going into the election next year. It’s all they have. They don’t know how to make government work, they don’t have any solid plans for moving our economy forward except “cut taxes”- and that hasn’t worked, it won't work, and they know it. So, they turn to simple destruction and will use that as a campaign issue. I guarantee they will point to the perceived failure in Lansing and paint the Democrats as the reason- they are already doing that. So much for the “partisan” complaint.

It’s up to the House to call them out on it, and stop this public perception NOW, before it really is too late. Dillon is off to a good start here- keep it up, Andy.

The future of this state depends on it.

Read more...

GR Mayor Heartwell has a question for the GOP contenders

Or should that be pretenders? Ha ha. Ha. Not funny.

This Wednesday is the CNN/YouTube Republican debate. Those of you with strong stomachs should tune it and let us know how it goes- I'm pretty sure there is a "Scrubs" marathon on somewhere and I don't want to miss that.

Anyway, here is Grand Rapids Mayor George Heartwell's question for the GOP-



Hello America, my name is George Heartwell, I'm the mayor of Grand Rapids Michigan, located in the Great Lakes region. Some call it the Rust Belt because we're moving too slowly from the industrial era to the digital age. The federal Great Lakes Restoration Act would help accelerate this transition, by launching a full scale clean up of our unique waterways, putting tens of thousands of people to work in jobs like fixing sewers, restoring wetlands, and building cities equipped to compete globally. As president, would you support fully funding this plan to restore America's Great Lakes?


In 2007, Carl Levin, with a boatload of cosponsors, introduced the Great Lakes Collaboration Implementation Act of 2007 which addresses the restoration of the Great Lakes. Even Vern Ehlers likes it!

Well, would they support it? Tune in to find out if they even answer the question.

Mayor Heartwell sat out in a canoe in the rain to film this- the least I can do is show him a little love here. :-)

Read more...

Gasoline. Fire. Names back on the ballot, but...

Dragging this out because we love the excruciating pain... the House voted tonight to restore the four names back on the primary ballot, but they didn't vote for immediate effect. It now goes back to the Senate, where the issue can suck all the oxygen out of the room for one more day.

The state House on Monday voted to restore to the ballot the names of four Democratic presidential candidates who withdrew earlier from Michigan's Jan. 15 primary, but fell short on a vote putting the bill into effect in time for the election.

The Senate and House could try again Tuesday to give the bill immediate effect, but some labor groups that support candidate John Edwards are trying to block the move.

House Speaker Andy Dillon, D-Redford, said he's confident there will enough House votes Tuesday to give the measure immediate effect if the Republican-led Senate sends the measure back after voting on it.


Tear it up. Too much hyperbole for me lately. Play nice, or I vote for Hillary just to piss you all off.

Read more...

Sunday, November 25, 2007

Dillon to hold vote Monday on returning names to primary ballot

They might actually pull this off and make Michigan relevant in the nomination process. Unbelievable.

Now House Speaker Andy Dillon, D-Redford Township, says he intends to hold a vote Monday on a bill that would reinstate the names of four presidential candidates who withdrew from the state's Democratic presidential primary last month.

If the legislation passes, Michigan will be poised to realize an improbable trifecta triumph: The first large-state contest in the 2008 presidential cycle, a ballot featuring all the leading candidates in both parties and an opportunity for every registered Michigan voter to participate.


What about the election reforms that the Senate Democrats proposed? Do we get those too? No answer yet, but it looks like the House Dems want to give this a go.

But Friday, facing the prospect of a one-sided rump primary, Dillon began counting votes, and by Saturday, he had decided to put legislation restoring the dropouts' names to a vote when the House reconvenes Monday.

"I don't know where Republicans are, but it looks like there's support" in the Democratic "caucus, so I'm going to put it up on Monday," Dillon told me Saturday afternoon. "That's my plan."


It has to be done tomorrow or Tuesday. That puts the Senate Republicans on the spot if those voter reforms are in the legislation. Won't that be interesting.

But Land, who has publicly expressed doubts that election officials could meet the Dec. 1 deadline for printing primary ballots if the Democratic lineup is altered, has privately assured Democratic leaders that her team can get absentee ballots out on schedule if the Legislature finalizes the candidate list Monday or Tuesday.


And what of the DNC punishment? Well, there is this...

New Hampshire, which also violated party rules when it rescheduled its primary for Jan. 8, will ask the Democratic National Committee to waive any penalties when the DNC's rule-making body meets next week, and Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., said Saturday that it would be hypocritical for the party to sanction Michigan if New Hampshire is forgiven.


Question is- will the voters forgive the four who pulled off? My guess is yes, for the most part. The anti-Clinton forces will have to. With Iowa so close, the others will have to make a strong showing here...

A Hail Mary as the clock runs out. Gotta admit, there’s never a dull moment with our lawmakers.

Read more...

Thursday, November 22, 2007

Happy Thanksgiving



Fall at Rosedale 2



Here's another one...

Read more...

Detroit Lions go green for Thanksgiving game

(This post dedicated to my Brett Favre lovin' Cheesehead Mom, who defected to the UP this year and is busy having fun today with all her Packer fan friends. Happy Thanksgiving Mom. Still hoping for an upset!)

Under the category of "every little bit helps", today's Detroit Lions game has gone green. Cool idea. Imagine if every NFL team did this, if only for one day.

The Detroit Lions say they'll take on the Green Bay Packers without warming the globe, buying a stake in a replanted rain forest in Ecuador to offset the up to 933 tons of carbon dioxide the Thanksgiving Day game is expected to generate.

The Lions will follow the standards for greenhouse gas offsets laid down by the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, according to the environmental engineering company handling Thursday's "green game" at Ford Field.


Michigan-based Carbon Credit Environmental Services Inc. approached Lions vice chairman Bill Ford and family about the idea, and they jumped at the chance. They set about calculating the carbon emissions of one football game, and bought trees to counter the effect for the first "carbon neutral" NFL game.

In the case of the Lions-Packers game, that includes the about 28,260 cars that fans use to get to the game, the equivalent of a Boeing 747 load of out-of-state visitors, and the stadium's electricity, water and natural gas use.

The company calculated that the total would not exceed 933 tons of carbon dioxide.

To offset that output, the company sold the Lions a stake in its 150,000-tree "carbon sink" tree plantation in Ecuador. The trees were planted six years ago, and they are estimated to absorb 3.5 to six tons of carbon dioxide each over their lifetime.

To be safe, Carbon Credit Environmental Services sold the Lions a stake in 500 trees.


Visit CCES on the web here. Thanks go out to the Lions and Bill Ford for doing this.

Happy Thanksgiving everyone!

Read more...

Wednesday, November 21, 2007

NFL Week 12



Green Bay at Detroit

NY Jets at Dallas

Indianapolis at Atlanta

New Orleans at Carolina

Tennessee at Cincinnati

Houston at Cleveland

Buffalo at Jacksonville

Oakland at Kansas City

Minnesota at NY Giants

Seattle at St. Louis

Washington at Tampa Bay

San Francisco at Arizona

Baltimore at San Diego

Denver at Chicago

Philadelphia at New England

Miami at Pittsburgh

Read more...

NFL Week 11 Results




Arizona 35, Cincinnati 27

Green Bay 31, Carolina 17

Cleveland 33, Baltimore 30 (OT)



Indianapolis 13, Kansas City 10



Philadelphia 17, Miami 7



Houston 23, New Orleans 10



Minnesota 29, Oakland 22



Jacksonville 24, San Diego 17



Tampa Bay 31, Atlanta 7



N.Y. Giants 16, Detroit 10



N.Y. Jets 19, Pittsburgh 16 (OT)



Dallas 28, Washington 23



St. Louis 13, San Francisco 9



Seattle 30, Chicago 23



New England 56, Buffalo 10



Denver 34, Tennessee 20



10-6.


101-59.

Read more...

Senate Republicans: Drug company victims not a "priority"

Did I call this right or what? All year long, Senate Republicans have used the budget as an excuse to avoid dealing with other issues- and just yesterday, they did it again. Funny how the House can take the time to work on matters that are of great concern to the citizens of Michigan, but the Senate just can't walk and chew gum at the same time, apparently. Thought they were supposed to be the "more experienced" chamber and could handle such things.


Or perhaps they just want to obstruct progress. If nothing good comes out of that chamber, then they can turn around and blame others when nothing good ever happens for the people of Michigan. Notice that pattern? Anyone?


This time, it's lack of action on the drug company immunity bill, which we mentioned just recently here. Go read for the full story. Basically, Michigan residents may miss out on the Vioxx award from Merck because of our one-of-a-kind, restrictive laws. At the time, I said "Senate Republicans will use the budget problems as an excuse". Why? Because that is what they do, time and time again.


Yesterday, Senate Democrats, with the help of Michigan Citizen Action and Progress Michigan, hit the AP with a story about the push to address this matter, and just like the talking doll with the string on its back, Matt Marsden uttered the those magic words that he feels explains why the Senate just can't find the time to help the people of this state. 


Matt Marsden, spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Mike Bishop, R-Rochester, said the drug immunity bill isn't a priority at this time because the Senate is focused on repealing an expanded tax on services before it takes effect Dec. 1.


"Isn't a priority". It was April that I noticed that was the key phrase they would use, and here it is the end of the year, and they are still using it, and they are still using their own budget obstruction as an excuse.


I guess the next question someone should ask is: When will Michigan's citizens be a "priority" for Senate Republicans?


Find a new excuse Matt. You have turned this one into a cliché at this point.

Read more...

MI Supreme Court: Primary can go forward

This is breaking right now on WOOD -


The Michigan Supreme Court on Wednesday decided to let the state's Jan. 15 presidential primary go forward, keeping alive Michigan's bid to be one of the early presidential contests.


What does this mean? A bunch of unhappy clerks.


From the Freep-


Overturning a pair of lower court rulings, a majority of the state Supreme Court Wednesday morning found the law setting the primary date and granting exclusive access to voter lists from it to the Democratic and Republican parties was not unconstitutional.


4-3 decision. Voter lists might not be unconstitutional, but it always struck me as a bad idea. Make them availble to everyone and there won't be a problem.


Will the legislature put those names back on the ballot? Stay tuned...

Read more...

Tuesday, November 20, 2007

George W. Bush shows Michigan the way

Got your attention? Good.


First of all, let's talk about more ominous news coming out of the auto industry, and what that will mean for our state in the short-term future. We will get to George in a minute.


Last Friday, the U of M released its economic forecast, and the words "critical" and "diversify" figure prominently after you look at the numbers and let the reality of all that sink in.


For a state limping along from seven years of continuous job losses, the economic forecasts released Friday showed how critical it is for Michigan to diversify its economy.


-snip-


Crary and her colleagues estimate Michigan will lose 76,000 jobs this year, more than triple the 24,000 lost jobs they had predicted a year ago. It will be the state's biggest employment decline since 2001.


Next year promises more of the same: another 51,000 fewer jobs. As a result, the state's unemployment rate is forecast to rise to 8.2%, the highest since the end of 1992, when the nation was in the midst of a recession.


And some more really scary numbers come from the Center for Automotive Research. Although the new UAW contracts will help retain some jobs by keeping costs competitive, when you add in the ripple effect from suppliers...


Sean McAlinden, vice president of research at the Center for Automotive Research in Ann Arbor, is forecasting employment in Michigan's auto industry will decline by 242,629 jobs between now and 2009, an amount equal to 5.7% of the state's labor force. The figure includes jobs at auto suppliers and other companies dependent on the automakers.


5.7%. Huge. And Sunday, some prominent investors warned of a nasty drop in auto sales for 2008.


Three top investors in the automotive industry painted a grim picture on Sunday for the sector in 2008, with one executive predicting a possible slump in U.S. sales to levels not seen in 15 years.


"Tapped out" consumers and the mortgage crisis will put the freeze on sales, with the investors predicting that the auto makers will cut factory production rather than offer incentives for purchase this time around.


"I hope I'm wrong on 14.5 (million) to 15 (million)," Stallkamp said. "But I think the mortgage issue is going to freak people out and that will hit pretty hard in '08."


Ross called it "a sort of poverty effect from house prices going down."


The mortgage crisis is now causing worries in the auto loan business, and all of this sent GM's stock tumbling on Monday, and we have this domino effect starting to kick in, and when our state's economy is still so closely tied to the fortunes of the auto industry, well, the screaming is going to get very loud next year.


Had enough yet? Want to get away? For one obvious answer to our problems, we turn to George W. Bush, over the jump...

No, not President George W. Bush. Never him. Governor George W. Bush.


Back in 1999, it was Gov. Bush who started the ball rolling on bringing wind energy to Texas.


It was then-Governor Bush who, in 1999, signed off on a landmark provision requiring utilities to get 2,000 megawatts of their electricity from renewables by 2009, setting off the largest annual increase in wind-farm construction in U.S. history. As president, Bush has resisted calls to include a similar provision in his national energy plan. But as the economics of wind improve, even Bush's industry allies point to Texas as proof that, with just a little push from the government, renewables can compete.


And look what happened in Texas over the next few years. They now lead the nation in wind production. Big job growth, big investments. By 2006, Gov. Rick Perry was lauding a public-private investment of $10 billion dollars, talking about how they are saving the environment, and pointing to all the jobs they have created.


"I am proud of our state's commitment to renewable energy production," Perry said. "We are on the leading edge of developing renewable sources of energy and a more diversified energy economy which is key to keeping costs down."


Perry, who was joined at the announcement by executives of several companies that have committed to building wind energy infrastructure, emphasized the benefits wind energy has on the environment.


For every 1000 megawatts generated by new wind sources, Texas will reduce carbon dioxide emissions by six million tons over the next 20 years.


Perry also noted that the announcement bodes well for further growth of the Texas economy.


"Over the past three years we have added 650,000 jobs, transformed a record budget deficit into a record budget surplus, and attracted more business expansions and relocations than any state in the nation," Perry said.


Texas. Certainly we can compete with the likes of Texas, especially when it comes to manufacturing the components for this explosive growth industry. Manufacturing is what we do best, right?


As you know, this month Governor Granholm has been meeting with businesses across the state that are moving forward in the renewable and alternative energy field. One of the first stops was at K & M Fabricating in Cassopolis, a company that produces those big, heavy pieces for large wind turbines.


For a good example of how former auto workers can find new jobs, crucial in light of the numbers above, a look what they are doing at K & M holds the key.


"Anybody who is being laid off or displaced should come here," Granholm said, referring to alternative energy businesses.


"People that have worked assembly jobs, machining or fabricating in the automotive industry, ours is a lot heavier duty than that, but the basics are the same and can translate," said K&M General Manager Derek McLoughlin.


And more from K & M. They tell us that the supply can't meet demand right now.


Gary J. Galeziewski, K&M's chief financial officer, said, "A significant amount of investors are rapidly putting their money into wind farm developments around this country." Michigan so far has just one.


"Windmill manufacturers are pretty much sold out into the foreseeable future," he continued. "What's fragile is their supply chain of manufacturers. They do not have the capacity in their supply chains of companies like K&M, which can manufacture all of these components for them. That's what needs to be developed. That's what we're bullish on. We have expansion plans under construction right now to move quickly at the velocity this industry is moving at to support wind farm development."


Explosive growth. Can't keep up. And we have the potential to make it happen here; our manufacturing capabilities can and should supply the country and the world with the pieces to make this happen.


And as far as producing our own energy needs for the state, instead of importing out-of-state (and country) energy like we do now, we have those resources right under our nose. Granholm again-


"In fact, I was told this morning that in the United States right now, the U.S. as a whole produces about 14,000 megawatts of wind. Michigan has the capacity to do 14,000 MW of wind by itself. We have the capacity to be the third-most productive state for wind.


Wind energy is just one part of the equation for Michigan. Wave energy is coming into play.


Second, water. "Many businesses - and we were with some of them Friday - are now moving into the area of capturing movement from water currents," the governor said. "Any time there's movement, you can capture that and feed it into the electric grid. There are some who are manufacturing wind turbines and, at the bottom of the turbine, if the turbine is out in the water, they put devices that capture the movement of the waves, so you've got a two-fer.


And wood. Granholm mentions what they are doing in Sweden-


"They're also taking advantage of something Michigan uniquely has, and that's wood. That goes to this issue of the next generation of ethanol. Two-thirds of Michigan's land is covered by forests. We have the largest footprint of publicly-owned forest land of any state in the country. What a huge opportunity for us as we look at cellulosic ethanol, the next generation.


And waste. What could be better than taking advantage of all that Canadian trash that everyone complains about?


"In Sweden, there's a region where they're getting 80 percent of their energy from burning municipal landfills," Granholm said. "But they don't let the CO2 (carbon dioxide) go up in the air, they capture it all and put it back into heating commercial and residential businesses. (Michigan) used to be the landfill capital of North America - and we still are. I hate to say that's something unique to Michigan we could capitalize on, but it actually is.


Michigan, please pay attention. If George Bush and the state of Texas can get something like wind energy started, and Rick Perry can talk about cleaning up the air and giggle with glee at all the money and jobs that they have created, there is no reason why we should listen to the coal-burning, nay-saying, knuckle-draggers like Nolan Finley anymore. There is no reason we should continue to rely on a volatile auto industry. We have the tools, we have the environment, we have the workers, we have the research capabilities, we can create jobs and protect the environment all at the same time. And when the auto industry starts to rebound, predicted for 2009, we will have that, too.


Texas came a long way in less than a decade. No reason why Michigan can't do that as well. Of course it will take some time to get to where we want to be, but we have the answers to our problems staring us right in the face. We can take advantage of this opportunity, start to move faster towards the obvious goals of a clean energy future, or we can sit back and continue to cry about our current economic conditions and let those that would hold us back purely for political reasons dominate the conversation. Your choice.


The cynical side says that George W. Bush just wanted to make a buck for his buddies in Texas, but look at what he started.


We can do the same. And we can do it better.

Read more...

The newest Senate Republican stall

(UPDATE: This diary now new and improved with the added Senate Republican bonus of one-time gimmicks! Check the comments for details!)


We are fast approaching Dec. 1st, a full two months after the budget for '08 was due, and believe it or not, Senate Republicans are still finding ways to stall this process. Good thing we didn't give them that continuation budget, huh? 


Service taxes. At first they said they wouldn't touch it. Then they said they would, and admitted they needed a full replacement. Then they changed their minds on that and started calling for cuts. They passed a delay and a repeal, but didn't pass replacement revenue. Go read this diary again for all the details, or this diary that shows they have been doing this all year. Tick, tick, tick, goes the clock, and, oh look!, we are done for the year, gotta go.


The press tries to play this off as "inexperience", but if they would look closer, they would see willful obstruction. Just try. It's there.


All the while, they blamed the Democrats for the whole thing, when it was their delays and waffling and Valde Garcia that came up with the idea in the first place and their refusal to look at a higher income tax back in the summer that forced ALL of this to come about.


Whew. That's a whole lotta obstructin' going on.


Sooooo, we come to today, and finally a Senate vote on the replacement, 12 days after the House passed one. First of all, check the framing from Dillon-


House Democrats on Monday called on Senate Republicans to pass the replacement tax plan the House approved on Nov. 8. The House had tentatively planned a session for today but called it off Monday afternoon.


"Business leaders and lawmakers from both sides of the aisle in the House worked together to craft a plan that promotes economic growth while protecting essential funding for our schools, public safety and health care for our seniors," Dillon said.


Good job guys. The House Dems really stepped up this time. Looks like they have learned their lesson. So proud of them.


But then, we get the newest, latest, greatest, obstruction to progress from the Senate- * drum roll * - placing a sunset provision in the replacement, something that Granholm said she wouldn't agree to when we started down this road in the first place.


Senate GOP spokesman Matt Marsden said the Senate proposal, like the House plan, would fully replace the revenue lost by repealing the tax on services.


But unlike the House plan, the Senate proposal would make the business tax increase temporary, he said. That could be problematic because Gov. Jennifer Granholm has threatened to veto any replacement of the services tax that is not a permanent tax increase.


Not only do Senate Republicans intend on screwing things up for the current legislature, they intend on sticking it to the future legislators, who also have to deal with the sunset on the income tax. Since they couldn't blow up this budget; they will blow up some budget down the road. Just like Engler.


Why not let the future lawmakers decide if economic conditions can provide for a cut in the revenue? Gee, what fun would that be?


The House isn't coming in today, so nothing will be final until after break. You're shocked, we know. One more time they push it right to the wire, and we sit back and wonder why nothing else ever gets done.

Read more...

Andy Dillon - No More Mr. Nice Guy

Wow. What in the world has gotten into Andy Dillon. You must check out the smack-down he lays on the Senate Republicans for the vote today that screws up the budget deal.


House Democrats today criticized the Republican-led State Senate for a party-line vote that gives businesses significant tax cuts at the expense of funding for education, health care and public safety, and blasts a huge hole in the budget that was passed less than one month ago.


"The Republican-led Senate broke its promise to the people of Michigan that our state would have fully funded schools, health care for seniors, and police and fire protection for our communities," said House Speaker Andy Dillon (D-Redford Twp.). "It ignores the reality that Michigan will be in dire straits again in just a few years if this plan goes into effect. The Senate Republicans' plan is a short-term fix that will have long-term repercussions for the people of Michigan. It shows a complete lack of foresight and planning."


The House Dems release points out that they passed a replacement plan that was supported by both the Detroit and Grand Rapids Chamber of Commerce, and the Michigan Manufacturing Association as well.


Wait. It gets better. Just like I mentioned earlier today, the Senate also created a problem for the future. Speaker Dillon didn't like that one bit, no siree.


"Senate Republicans have set the state of Michigan up to fall into a giant black hole in 2011, when they won't be around to deal with the consequences," Dillon said. "This shows irresponsible and cowardly leadership. It also shows that Senate Republicans are willing steal from our residents and from Michigan's future to score points with a handful of businesses today. They should be ashamed of what they did today."


Think Andy might be a little ticked off?


This never flies in the House, obviously, and from MIRS we get this-


The bill seems to set up another bare-knuckle brawl between the Senate and the House and Gov. Jennifer GRANHOLM's administration. The Governor has said she wanted bill that's bipartisan, revenue-neutral and permanent - and the Senate version meets none of those criteria.


Mike Bishop said in MIRS, "Senate Republicans are not obstructionists". Um, yes they are. By passing this bill, they are proving that they have no intention of solving this problem anytime soon, the problem they created in the first place.


Mad props to the Speaker for calling them out on it. That's what we like to see!

Read more...

Monday, November 19, 2007

Tim Walberg, Time's poster child for Republican indifference

Somewhere this morning, Mark Schauer is smiling.


This week's Time magazine asks the question: "Will Bad Mortgages Hurt the GOP?"- and holds up Tim Walberg as a prime example of conservative indifference to the mortgage crisis that is hurting so many, especially right here in Michigan.


2008 is shaping up to be a bad year for the Bush Republicans if they continue to be tone-deaf to the concerns of average people. Predatory lending practices? Not a problem, says Tim. Just a few folks hurt by that. No big deal.


Last Thursday, to the delight of Democrats, Walberg lived up to his conservative ideals - voting against a bill in the House that tightens restrictions against predatory lending. The measure, which garnered the support of 64 Republicans in passing 291-127, would force lenders to apply for licenses and require them to verify the ability of borrowers to repay loans. "I think the market always works when we let it," Walberg told TIME just before voting against the measure. "We want to make sure that we have opportunities for consumers to have safe and opportune mortgages. This bill, I think, goes away from that, puts heavy regulation in place, discourages lending practices for just very few people who've had that problem."


Time goes on to reel off a bunch of statistics about the condition of the housing market in Michigan, and then they do they practically unthinkable- they make Joe Knollenberg seem like a rational human being. Not only did Joe support the bill, he wants to see more measures put in place to protect homeowners.


"I'm not satisfied with the bill in its current form, but I am going to vote for it. I think that there are some things that could be done to further enhance and help these people."


This bill put Walberg firmly in the "extreme" camp; 64 House Republicans joined Democrats in support of cracking down on predatory lending. Tim seemingly brushes off the "10-15%" of the loans that were "fraudulent or took advantage of people" and called this measure "gotcha" politics. I guess in Tim's world it's OK to throw some folks overboard- better hope that person isn't you.


Enter Senator Mark Schauer, who Time calls a "top tier" opponent.


After Walberg's narrow victory in 2006 (a race in which he outspent his opponent by $1.2 million to $46,000), the Democrats this time have recruited a top tier opponent: State Senator Mark Shauer, who has championed the predatory lending issue in the state legislature, co-sponsoring legislation that would tighten oversight on loan officers and supports programs to help homeowners refinance their mortgages. Schauer plans on campaigning on the issue and accuses Walberg of turning his back on people in need. "The people in Michigan are struggling, and we're doing what we can to help at the state level," Schauer said. "But Washington and my opponent need to step up."


The state legislature needs to step up too- but this is yet another issue that our Republican Senate won't address, of course. Guess that puts them to the right of Joe Knollenberg.


What is Tim's response to this? Blow off the concerns, don't address the problem, and, quick!, point at the governor!


Walberg said he's not worried. "Michigan's got far more problems than just this. The economic climate with the expensive tax increases just put on by the State Legislature and the governor, the challenges with the auto industry: these are far greater concerns than this."


That is going to be one tired message by this time next year, a broken record that will prove that the Republicans have absolutely no vision or ideas for fixing the problems that face Michigan citizens. All they can do is point at Granholm. Got a hunch that answer won't satisfy the electorate.


Happy Thanksgiving, Senator Schauer. Wipe that grin off your face, OK? ;-)

Read more...

Sunday, November 18, 2007

Mackinac Center misleading the public

Way back on January 11th of this year, I wrote a post about Mike Bishop constantly using the phrase "single state recession" to describe Michigan's economy. A financial analyst from an investment firm in Bloomfield Hills had said that, technically, we were not in a recession, so of course I jumped all over that. Not really the point of this diary, but some set-up was required here. I went on to say this-


It also begs the question: What ELSE are the Republicans exaggerating when they make economic claims such as this? The list is long, and perhaps every single one of them should be scrutinized for authenticity.


You can start with the Mackinac Center. It would be a field day.


Field day was last Friday. Turns out that someone should have been scrutinizing the Mackinac Center's claims all year long, because lo and behold, last Friday night in MIRS, we read this-


The head of the House Fiscal Agency believes that the conservative Mackinac Center for Public Policy was a disservice to the public during the budget process this year.


"The press they get tends to mislead the public, in my opinion," said Mitch BEAN, director of the House Fiscal Agency. "They act as if all these easy decisions can be made to cut $2 billion out of the budget when it's simply not true."


The House Fiscal Agency is non-partisan, and they "provide confidential, nonpartisan expertise to the House Appropriations Committee and all other members of the House on all legislative fiscal matters." In other words, they are pros at this sort of stuff.


Mitch Bean goes on to tear apart the Mackinac Center's claims on some of the cuts they proposed during the budget crisis- and as you know, the Mac Center is frequently cited in the press as the go-to guys for "proof" of validity on conservative fiscal philosophy.


Bad idea. Using the examples that Bean provided, that needs to come to an end, or at least the press should take a closer look at these claims of savings before printing them as gospel. For starters, the Mac Center said this-


- Saving $192 million by putting 5 percent of prisoners in privately managed prisons, generating 14 percent savings.


Bean rips that theory up, over the jump...

Flawed math, it turns out.


So [cut] $192 million by putting five percent of prisoners in privately run prisons," said Bean. "We actually have experience with a privately run prison - the Youth Correctional Facility in Baldwin that was instituted under the previous administration. The contract was cancelled because the Auditor General and both Fiscal Agencies found it wasn't saving money. In fact … it was probably costing more money."


Bean also questioned the reasoning behind the math that would lead one to discern a 14 percent savings from a transfer of five percent of prisoners.


"If you just let five percent of the prisoners out of prison, the most you could save is 5 percent. If you could shrink your staff five percent, shrink your facilities by five percent - the most you could save is five percent," he said. "The idea that you could save 14 percent by sticking five percent of your prisoners in a private facility is quite frankly pretty ridiculous."


Bean did this with four other examples in the article, pointing out that each time, the "cuts" that the Mac Center claimed were "savings" weren't saving anything at all- and in fact some were probably going to cost us more, either financially, like the example above on private prisons, or in reduced public safety, such as cutting the State Police Road Patrol and turning that money over to the county sherriffs.


One example concerning the Hay Report on school insurance reform was $230 million off the mark, and not only that, they were using old data - most schools had probably already implemented the recommendations in an attempt to cut costs.


The Hay Report itself notes that in the first year the recommended changes would cost the state $1.5 million to implement and that the maximum savings would be $192 million in the second year - not the $422 million the Mackinac Center claims.


And on prevailing wage, it is obvious the Center was grasping at absurd figures to push their anti-worker agenda.


On prevailing wage, the Mackinac Center slaps on a $150 million savings on school construction projects by state repeal of the law. Bean, an economist by training, notes that to reach $150 million in savings you'd have to assume a public school construction labor cost load of $1.5 billion. As wages are only 1/3 of the cost of construction, that means there would have to be $4.5 billion in construction going on each year to realize the savings.


Bean went on to say that this funding is done at the local level and the savings would be realized there- not for the state.


I waited over the weekend to see if this might pop up anywhere in the traditional media; of course it did not.


Question now is: will the press continue to use the Mackinac Center as a source of valid information without doing the homework behind the claims? My guess is yes. But just so you know, whenever you see them refered to as experts on fiscal policy in the papers, take the things they say with a huge grain of salt from here on out. They are distorting facts to push their agenda.


It's the Republican way.

 

Read more...

NFL Week 11



Tampa Bay at Atlanta

Cleveland at Baltimore

N.Y. Giants at Detroit

Arizona at Cincinnati

Carolina at Green Bay

New Orleans at Houston

Kansas City at Indianapolis

San Diego at Jacksonville

Oakland at Minnesota

Miami at Philadelphia

Pittsburgh at NY Jets

Washington at Dallas

Chicago at Seattle

St. Louis at San Francisco

New England at Buffalo

Tennessee at Denver

Read more...

Fall at Rosedale



Fall at Rosedale



Stopped by to say hi to Scott. Hard to believe that it has been six years next weekend.



Miss you man.



Reflections

Read more...

Thursday, November 15, 2007

It's presidential poll time in Michigan

Hide the kids.


EPIC/MRA is making an honest man out of Ed Sarpolus again, and here are your results on the latest Michigan poll of current presidential contenders. As Rick Albin says, these polls are a "snapshot in time", and your mileage may vary, or something like that.


For the Democrats- the Hillary Machine is stomping the competition.


Clinton is running away from the Democratic field -- even though she and the other Democratic candidates refuse to campaign here, because the state ran afoul of national party rules by scheduling its primary ahead of other states.


She is now is favored by 49 percent of likely Democratic primary voters in Michigan, up from 40 percent in the Sept. 1 survey. Second-place candidate Illinois Sen. Barack Obama, who had 21 percent of the vote in late summer, now stands at a very distant 18 percent. And former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards is stuck in the mid teens -- despite support from union leaders.


And the breakdown by gender-


According to the survey, 60 percent of female voters prefer Clinton with Obama a distant second at 18 percent. Among men, however, Clinton's support drops to 32 percent, still tops in the field. Edwards got 21 percent support among men while Obama received support from 19 percent of the men surveyed.


And for the Republicans, the picture gets a little murky-


Giuliani is favored by 28 percent of likely GOP primary voters -- slightly better than the 25 percent support for Romney, a Michigan native whose father was the state's governor in the 1960s. Both former Tennessee Sen. Fred Thompson and Arizona Sen. John McCain continue to stagnate. Thompson is still third, now at 13 percent, followed by McCain, at 12 percent. That's not good news for either, but it's particularly troublesome for McCain, who won Michigan's 2000 presidential primary, and had hoped to establish a beach head here.


But wait! Here comes Mike Huckabee!


Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee was hardly a blip -- just 3 percent -- in the News/WXYZ poll published Sept. 1. But he's tripled his support since then. And while he's still way behind the leaders, his progress is significant.


An ordained Baptist minister, Huckabee has been running strong in Iowa polls, where he is second behind Romney. Huckabee has inherited some supporters of Kansas Sen. Sam Brownback, who quit the presidential race and endorsed Huckabee. Furthermore, Huckabee's moderate stances on economic issues, and his social conservatism, may find an audience in Michigan.


No mention of internet darling Ron Paul.

Read more...

Wednesday, November 14, 2007

"Do-over" on MESSA?

Seems only fair. If the Senate Republicans insist on "more cuts", or continues to drag their feet on the service tax issue, or inserts a sunset on the replacement revenue, perhaps it is time to revisit the entire trade. From Gongwer-


Nearly half of the Democratic lawmakers in the House have signed on as sponsors to legislation augmenting the health care pooling reforms put in place for public school employees during the budget battle earlier this fall and the chair of the Education Committee said he plans on taking up HB 5454.


The legislation would essentially make schools with 250 or more employees, and not 100 as in current statute, open up their health care coverage for competitive bidding.


House Education Chair Rep. Tim Melton (D-Auburn Hills) said since the Senate opened the door on repealing the service tax, he's open to addressing the MESSA issue once the replacement is agreed upon. Legislators have told Gongwer News Service they're being asked to revisit the issue by teachers since the Legislature already has embraced repealing the service tax that was also part of the overall budget agreement.


Mr. Melton said there was no good statistical data showing a requirement for 100 employees was the best route to go, but there is evidence a larger group of 250 does make better policy and doesn't run into as much HIPPA compliance issues.


Seems the Senate Republicans have a problem with this.


Matt Marsden, spokesperson for Senate Majority Leader Mike Bishop (R-Rochester) said Tuesday, the school health care pooling measure was a significant reform agreed upon during budget negotiations.


"I would strongly recommend the House Democrats leave it as it is," he said.


Or... what? Matt didn't say.


A deal is a deal.

Read more...

Granholm creates Michigan Climate Action Council

Executive orders are fun. From tonight's MIRS-


Gov. Jennifer GRANHOLM late today announced that she's signed an executive order dealing with climate change and global warming in Michigan.


By executive order, the Governor created a Michigan Climate Action Council to develop a plan for the state to deal with climate change. The plan will provide state leaders with recommendations on reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the state.


Tomorrow Granholm travels to Wisconsin to the Midwestern Governors Association meeting where they will discuss a regional platform for "energy security and climate stewardship". They will probably have a nice lunch, too.


More on the council-


The Michigan Climate Action Council will be comprised of 35 representatives from public interest groups, environmental organizations, utilities, the manufacturing sector and other key industries, universities, and state and local government. The council will compile an inventory and forecast of greenhouse gas emissions in Michigan and produce a plan for reducing those gasses.


An interim report on policy recommendations is due by the end of next March, with a final, detailed report due by the end of next year.


Sounds like a plan- and here's another very ambitious plan-


The executive directive issued by Governor Granholm will require a 10 percent reduction in energy use by the end of 2008. As part of the directive, the state will - wherever feasible - increase use of alternative fuels in its fleet of vehicles; develop a materials management plan to ensure environmentally sound purchasing, use, reuse and recycling of materials by state departments; and ensure that new state owned or leased buildings meet Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) standards. The state will also reduce its electrical energy purchases by 20 percent by 2015.


To help the state reduce its electrical consumption, Senate Republicans have been instructed to stop using lights and microphones at their press conferences; instead, it is suggested that they hold up candles and just shout at the reporters.


Matt Marsden could not be reached for comment.


Oh, wait... I'm told that last paragraph is NOT part of the executive directive.


BFM regrets the error.




State newswire story here.

Read more...

Tuesday, November 13, 2007

NFL Week 10 Results- Ack! said Bill the Cat



Buffalo 13, Miami 10


Pittsburgh 31, Cleveland 28


Denver 27, Kansas City 11


Jacksonville 28, Tennessee 13


Green Bay 34, Minnesota 0


Philadelphia 33, Washington 25


St. Louis 37, New Orleans 29


Atlanta 20, Carolina 13


Cincinnati 21, Baltimore 7


Chicago 17, Oakland 6


Dallas 31, N.Y. Giants 20


Arizona 31, Detroit 21


San Diego 23, Indianapolis 21


Seattle 24, San Francisco 0



6-8. Wow, that was bad.



91-53.

Read more...

Don't these people have jobs?

Congress must have declared "National Partisan Pile On Your Governor Month". Wonder if this is happening elsewhere in the country. It seems that suddenly the Michigan Republicans in Washington have found that Granholm is, indeed, the number one problem on their minds; so, they have lined up frivolous complaints in an ill-fated attempt to divert our attention from the fact that Republican policies in DC have reaped disastrous results across the land. Perhaps they think meddling in state affairs is the answer to that. Just spreading the love is all.


First up, Tim Walberg chimes in to the LSJ in a bizarre letter that was neither coherent nor relevant to any particular issue, just a general "Tax! Bad! Ugh!" cry to fans of the pink pig.


Thanks to our tax-hiking state government, we now have the highest national unemployment rate and the worst state economy in the nation.


And we managed to accomplish that in one whole month after a tax increase! You would think that six straight years of tax cuts might have had a little something to do with the situation we found ourselves in- but no, in Walberg's world, it happened just that quick! And it's all Granholm's fault!


Tim goes on to swoon over John Engler, never mentioning the fact that Big John spent all the savings in the cookie jar and set it up so we had no more cookies coming in to keep the state running after he blew town. And funny how Tim completely ignores the record deficits from Bush and the borrow and borrow some more Republicans in Washington, no, any national economic slowdown will be the fault of the Democrats because they are following Granholm's month old example of paying the bills. Guess they needed her permission or something.


He's got something called the "Tax Increase Prevention Act", probably drawn straight from Grover's fevered imagination, and look for that to go nowhere fast. Dine-and-dash Republicans have run up the tab, and now Tim wants to pass a law to prevent us from paying for it. Sure wish we could do that with our credit cards.


We hear from Candice Miller, and the return of the turtles, over the jump...
Next up we have Candice Miller, complaining about a line-item veto that cut $250 grand from the DEQ's budget for a water monitoring program in the St. Clair River, Lake St. Clair, Clinton River and Detroit River watershed. She called for our Legislature to return the money.


"I urge the Michigan Legislature to take whatever action necessary to restore this critical funding that was stripped by the governor's actions."


OK Candice, we'll raise taxes to pay for it. But you better clear that with Tim Walberg first.


Why the veto? Turns out they didn't spend the money they got last time.


In an e-mail, Liz Boyd, Granholm's press secretary, said no one is more concerned about protecting the Great Lakes than Gov. Granholm.


"That is one reason why this project has been funded every year since 2004," Boyd said. "But given the local agencies have failed to spend the money that was appropriated last year, this funding was not needed."


No matter. Miller wants us to spend more, now, anyway. Think this survived on Bishop's original list of cuts? I don't feel like looking it up.


And last, but certainly not least, you remember that Pete "Turtle Power" Hoesktra kicked this all off by sticking his nose in where it didn't belong, complaining that we were actually using federal funds in the way they were intended, shocker that it is, and he didn't like that one bit, no sir. The Governor rightly smacked him down, and now his constituents have joined in the fray.


U.S. Rep. Pete Hoekstra was on Grand Rapids' TV-8's "To the Point" last Sunday morning with a big spin that the turtle fence created no jobs. The anti-environmental West Michigan Republicans are planting every "red herring" they can preparing for the 2008 election.


The fact is, the turtle fence absolutely provided jobs for the installers and sales for the material suppliers. What Hoekstra is really upset over is that Haliburton didn't get the $318,000 to hire his Blackwater boys to stand turtle guard over the freeway.


Hoekstra finally backed down and admitted that more flexibility needs to be provided at the federal level. He introduced that legislation after he spent a month wasting our time.


"If Michigan needs greater flexibility from Washington to better prioritize its most pressing needs then I will work to provide it," said Hoekstra, R-Holland.


Maybe you should have done that in the first place, Pete.


I guess we should be grateful that our representatives are actually paying attention to our state since they have spent so much time in office ignoring us, but I'm not sure this is exactly what we had in mind.

Read more...

Sign of the times

I love graffiti.


Do I approve of defacing public property? No, of course not. Costs a fortune to keep cleaning it up. And tagging for the most part is just boring; an expression of territorial pissing matches between gangs or individual taggers rather than a heartfelt feeling of pure emotion or sentiment (or the boredom of lovelorn teenagers).


Still, graffiti carries with it the signs of the times- whether they are popular musicians, songs, slang, current favored methods of altering your consciousness- or even current events. You read it, you get a picture of what is going on in the street, even if on the surface it seems rather crude and for the most part ignorant.


Jack Lessenberry doesn't know what he is missing. (By the way, Jack was talking about wingnut bloggers, if that makes you feel better). There are nuggets of truth to be found in the scribbles, a snapshot in time on the thoughts of those kids, sometimes adults, who are hanging out with a pen or knife in their hand and have nothing better to do but to write down whatever they are feeling.


Just recently, I was surprised to find this one on a picnic table in Riverside Park, located on the north side of Grand Rapids. Amidst the "JM loves BT" and "50 Cent Rulz" and "smoke more hash" (hash is back?), I noticed this-


Riverside Graffiti


The kids are alright. We just need them to stop vandalizing public property.


And we need to help them out if they are sent off to war.


Donate today.


This is a Blogging For Michigan Troop Care post.  From November 11 through November 25, 2007, Blogging For Michigan will use 100% of every dollar received in the Troop Care fund to purchase and ship items to Michigan troops in Iraq and Afghanistan.  Learn more about BFM Troop Care here. Click here to contribute to Troop Care.  Contributions are not tax deductible.

Read more...

Monday, November 12, 2007

Michigan may miss out on Vioxx award

Why? Bad laws passed in bad times that made Michigan one-of-a-kind in the nation when it comes to holding drug manufacturers responsible for their defective products. We aren't allowed to sue. House Democrats have passed legislation to overturn this law way back in the spring- and it has stalled in the Republican Senate.


Friday, Senate Democrats called on their Republican colleagues to take action.


Senate Democrats once again today called on Senate Republican's to take up bills that provide justice to Michigan victims of dangerous drugs. Yesterday Merck, the manufacturer of the dangerous drug Vioxx, announced that it would be offering billions of dollars in a lawsuit settlement to potentially 47,000 victims around the country, but Michigan victims and their families are prevented from seeking recourse because of our state's drug immunity law.


Michigan is the only state in the nation with a law prohibiting recourse for consumers who are injured or have family members killed by a harmful drug. In February, the Michigan House of Representatives approved reform legislation that would repeal immunity for drug companies and restore consumer's rights, but the Republican-controlled Senate has refused to take up the package.


The House passed this 70-39, with 13 Republicans voting for the bill.


February.


Senate Republicans will use the budget problems as an excuse for ignoring this and other legislation that the House somehow found the time to work on. Watch them over the flip...


The AP ran an article yesterday that pointed out how other issues are taking a back seat this year due to the budget issues, but the AP failed to mention all the time off that was taken over the summer.


The budget has sucked the oxygen out of the Capitol," says Sen. Patricia Birkholz, a Republican from Saugatuck and chairwoman of the Senate's Natural Resources and Environmental Affairs Committee. "It's taken literally all of our working hours on many days."


Like that one time the Senate Republicans left even the budget hanging because they took off for the day? There is video of this. Why couldn't they work on it then? The cameras filmed an empty chamber with Democrats standing around ready to work, but no Republicans to be found.


Or, how about that time that Senator Schauer called them the "Do-Nothing" Senate in this video that featured charts showing how few bills they have worked on this year to that point (Aug 2nd), and also told us how they would only meet one day a week in August.


Not to mention the change in rules that kept them on a two-week vacation in July. The budget may have "taken all their working hours" on the days they were there, but then again, you have to remember they weren't there all that much over the summer.


They were opportunites to work on these things, they just didn't do it. Now attorneys for Michigan residents are waiting to hear whether or not they will be able to share the Vioxx award. They brought the suit in New Jersey due to our laws.


"We think this applies to all plaintiffs in the U.S., with no distinction to where people live," said Mark Bernstein, of the Farmington Hills-based Bernstein Law Firm.


The firm sued in New Jersey courts on behalf of 75 Michiganders who died suddenly or had heart attacks or strokes linked to the drug.


The words "we think" coming from a lawyer indicates that there is a chance that it may not apply, or perhaps Merck could appeal for Michigan residents. It would be really bad PR, but this being a major drug company...


Senate Republicans have had plenty of time to address this issue; there is a reason why they have chosen not to. Jack Lessenberry predicted as much back on Feb. 21st-


Write, call, scream at or otherwise put pressure on your friendly homegrown state senator - especially Senate Majority Leader Mike Bishop, a Republican from Rochester. Here's why: Naturally, Bishop is going to oppose any bill that puts people ahead of corporations.

  -snip-


What the Republican leadership will try to do is to bury this bill in committee and prevent it from ever coming up for a vote. Big Pharma has plenty of lobbyists who are working hard to help them do this, by the way.


And that is exactly what happened.


You could write, call or scream again now, but your window of opportunity is getting pretty small. After they get back from their current two-week vacation, they are scheduled out for the year on Dec. 6th.

Read more...

Vacation more important than fixing service tax issue

Surprised?


It appears the state Legislature isn't ready to finish work repealing a much-criticized services tax.


Both the House and Senate canceled sessions that were tentatively set for Tuesday.


The sessions would have meant interrupting a two-week break held each November. It's still possible the House and Senate could be called back into session later in the two-week period.


They said that last summer too. Don't hold your breath on that one.


Guess fixing their mistake wasn't that important after all. Sorry, business, you will just have to wait.


Lessenberry had a good scribble on his wall today-


Balancing the state budget has turned into a remake of the Night of the Living Dead. Just when you think the last stake has been hammered through the heart of the last deficit vampire.


No. This never ends. That is just the way the Senate wants it- nothing will ever get done, and then they can complain about how bad things are. Look for this pattern to continue next year also.

Read more...

Sunday, November 11, 2007

BFM Troop Care



(For those still checking in here from time to time...)



The Blogging For Michigan community is excited to announce Blogging For Michigan Troop Care.  The goal of the program is to provide support to Michigan troops stationed in Iraq and Afghanistan.


From November 11 through November 25, bloggers at bloggingformichigan.com (BFM) will be publishing articles to raise awareness of the unique challenges faced by our troops and our veterans.  During this two week period, we are asking readers to make a contribution to the Troop Care fund.  100% of this fund will be used to purchase and ship items such as socks, hand lotion, soap, shampoo, magazines, DVDs, dried foods, etc., to Michigan troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. 


Readers are also being asked to leave messages of support for our troops.


We are proud to say that we are joined in our efforts by Troop Care Partners such as General Motors employees and members of UAW Local 598, from Flint's GM Truck & Bus.  There are hundreds of veterans employed with GM Truck & Bus.




We are also being aided in our efforts by individuals like Shiawassee County Commissioner Jack Johnson, who will be taking contributions at his place of business and at County Commissioner meetings.


Troop Care will be shipping to Michigan units who have requested items through the website, AnySoldier.com.  By using AnySoldier.com, we can be reasonably assured that the items requested by the troops will reach their intended recipients.


Click here to donate to Troop Care now.


FAQ:



Are you a charity?


No, we're a business under the name of BFM Media LLC, proud to do something good for our soldiers.  In addition to collecting, we are also contributing.  We hope you will join us in this effort.


Is my contribution tax deductible?


No.  It is not tax deductible.  We are sending items to service members in Iraq and Afghanistan, which means that contributions are not being used for a "charitable purpose" as defined by law.


Do you have a solicitation license?


No.  We have a letter of determination from AG that none is necessary.  You may read that letter of determination here.  (pdf format)


Will all the funds be used for the troops?


Yes. Absolutely 100% of all funds collected between November 11 and November 25, 2007, will be used to purchase and ship items to our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan.



Where are the names/contact info of soldiers coming from?


AnySoldier.com, which is recommended by the National Military Family Association.  Our own blogger and Iraq Vet, djtyg, says AnySoldier.com is "the real deal."


I want to send something to the Michigan troops directly.  How can I do this?


Just visit AnySoldier.com and follow the link, "Where To Send."  On the left side, there is a drop down link labeled "view contacts sorted by" ... use the drop down list and select "where unit is from."  A second drop down list will appear.  Select "Michigan", and then "go".  Each name that appears is a link to information about that person's unit.  Click on the names to find out more about the unit and what they need.  (See the image to the right)


You will need to fill out a form to get their contact information.


I want to contribute, but I don't want to do business online.  Can I send you a check?


Absolutely!  Make checks payable to:


BFM Media LLC

PO Box 62

Corunna, MI  48817


We have to receive it by November 30, in order to use it for Troop Care.


I'm not a Troop Care Partner, or a member of local 598, can I still contribute?


Yes, anyone can contribute to Troop Care by clicking here.


What is a Troop Care Partner?


Troop Care Partners are people and organizations who are collecting funds for Troop Care, or who are blogging and publicizing the Troop Care Program on BFM. 


To become a Troop Care Partner, just let us know that you want to participate!  We will get in touch with you to give you more details. 


As a Troop Care Partner, we'll give you prominent mention on the site, and make sure your name is visible throughout the two week program.  And, you'll know that you're doing something excellent for our Michigan troops!


I have a story to tell or a message of concern for the public.  Can I make it a Troop Care post?


Absolutely, if it's relevant to our troops, veterans, or their families.  Bloggingformichigan.com is a community site, and anyone can sign up for a free account and start posting diaries.  If you submit a post that is Troop Care material (and comprehensible, please), we'll put the Troop Care logo in it and tag it, 'troop care'.


If you're a new user, make sure you sign up with an email where we can reach you and verify details. Like other blogs, we occasionally "promote" the work of new writers to the front page. Your diary will get every consideration.


You can also send us your stories, at bloggingformichigan@gmail.com, and we can publish them for you.

We reserve the right to reject material that is not appropriate.

I have a question not answered here.


Contact us at bloggingformichigan@gmail.com


Enough with the FAQs!  I'm ready to contribute!


Excellent!  Our troops thank you!  Click here to donate to Troop Care now.

Read more...

Farmer Dick DeVos rakes in the federal bucks

Did you know that Dick & Betsy are farmers? And that they received over $12,000 in federal subsidies for that over the last few years?


Neither did I. Neither did they, they claim anyway.


A must-read on the front page of today's GR Press entitled "Do your taxes feed the rich?" has all the details- but we knew the answer to that question already, didn't we?


Not everybody who gets crop subsidies is a farmer.


Consider Dick DeVos. That Dick DeVos. The former president of Alticor Inc., the son of one of the richest men in the country, the Republican who ran the most expensive campaign for governor in Michigan history.


He got more than $6,000 in federal farm subsidies from 2003 to 2005, mostly for corn.


His wife, Betsy, got an equal share.


-snip-


Critics of the far-reaching farm bill, being debated in the U.S. Senate, hope to change that. They say too many millionaires, absentee landowners and big factory farms benefit from a program born in the 1930s to help family farmers survive the Dust Bowl and Great Depression.


Federal farm subsidies are not an area that I am well-versed in, and I'm not about to start now, but it is rather interesting in light of the fact that Dick makes such a big deal out of "spending" to learn that, once again, his family is a beneficiary of said spending.


Dick and Betsy DeVos' agricultural ground is 722 acres east of the Grand River in Ada Township, near Pettis and Egypt Valley avenues NE and south of Two Mile Road.


Their Ada Holdings LLC bought it parcel by parcel in the early 2000s for a total of more than $5.2 million, Ada Township property records show.


From 2001 to 2005, Ada Holdings raked in $30,413 in farm subsidies for corn, wheat and soybeans, according to USDA records released to the Environmental Working Group. Dick and Betsy DeVos' share was $6,530 each.


Dick DeVos, whose gubernatorial platform included cutting government waste and putting a "time limit on welfare," did not return phone calls for this story.


But spokesman John Truscott said the DeVoses were not aware they were getting subsidies.


Really? I guess with all that Wingnut Welfare pouring in the family bank accounts, it's hard to keep track of those little amounts, isn't it, John.


Everybody sing-a-long now… "Green Acres is the place to be..."

Read more...

NFL Week 10



(OPEN DATES: Houston, New England, N.Y. Jets, Tampa Bay)



Atlanta at Carolina

Minnesota at Green Bay

Denver at Kansas City

Buffalo at Miami

St. Louis at New Orleans

Cleveland at Pittsburgh

Jacksonville at Tennessee

Philadelphia at Washington

Cincinnati at Baltimore

Detroit at Arizona

Dallas at NY Giants

Chicago at Oakland

Indianapolis at San Diego

San Francisco at Seattle

Read more...

Saturday, November 10, 2007



To Walk A Different Path

For Kristin on her birthday...

Read more...

Friday, November 09, 2007

House replaces tax, DeRoche up past bedtime once again

(UPDATE: Here's a link to the House Dems release and a list of businesses that support the compromise)


Seriously, people, put that kid to bed earlier, would you? Getting a little tired of the late night tantrums from the "Let's Just Cut the Poor People" House Republicans.


Last night the House voted to repeal and replace the services taxes, but not before Cranky Craig pitched his usual fit.


The state House on Thursday passed a bill that would kill a much-maligned tax on services and replace hundreds of millions in lost revenue by raising Michigan's main business tax.


The bill passed by a 58-48 vote. Democrats in the majority supported it, while all but two Republicans opposed the measure.


Most businesses are satisfied, others have concerns of course, call your accountant for more information, but the fact is, it got done, thanks to the House Democrats.


The service tax is scheduled to take effect Dec. 1. Lawmakers were planning a two-week recess beginning today, but the Senate tentatively decided to come back to work Tuesday and Nov. 20 and could take up the service tax replacement legislation then. The House also has scheduled tentative session on those days.


"This is a signal to the business community that we're going to be responsible and do the right thing," said House Speaker Andy Dillon, D-Redford Township after passage of the bill.


Craig would have none of that "responsibility" stuff. Even though he knows that the Governor would never sign a bill that doesn't include full replacement, he proclaimed that the original deal is now broken, we should go after the children and the sick instead, and generally create utter chaos with the entire budget.


Keep in mind that House Republicans wouldn't vote for the cuts in the first place. Also keep in mind that they overwhelmingly supported spending the money that this revenue produces. From Gongwer-


Mr. DeRoche said in the past there were are budget cuts some Democrats have voted for, such as cutting Wayne County Community Mental Health, making welfare reforms and taking away Medicaid for 19 and 20-year-olds, that should be done instead of asking businesses to pay more in taxes and pitting groups against each other.  He said if there is no more service tax the budget agreement is broken, the budget targets no longer exist, and the budget should be reopened and cuts negotiated.


Nice guy, huh? And, can you imagine re-opening the entire budget at this point? Lunacy.


DeRoche then took a healthy swipe and Dillon and the Democrats, and I bet some more people lose their parking spaces over this one...


go get 'em Andy, over the flip...
The Republicans wanted to add amendments that would have simply repealed the tax (which would never fly), the Democrats moved on to get the job done. DeRoche didn't like that. This one comes from MIRS-


"Andy and I had a deal on those procedural votes" DeRoche told MIRS. "But then he came over and said he wasn't a strong enough leader to stick to his deal. Basically he went back on his word in order to appease a few goof balls in his caucus."


Is that verbatim, Craig? Did Andy really say that to you? Doubtful.


But Dillon spokesman Greg BIRD said it was DeRoche and the Republicans who were out-of-line.


"It's unfortunate that those across the aisle are playing politics with this important issue," Bird said. "The real story tonight is that the House Democrats voted to end this tax that everyone agreed should be eliminated. We did so with replacement revenues that were supported by several groups within the business community. We protected education, health and public safety in Michigan."


Yes, once again House Republicans were out of line, and once again the adults took charge and did the job.


This goes to the Senate now, and Marsden is taking the "I'll think about it tomorrow" approach. Could have sworn it was the Senate Republicans that were all up in arms to get this accomplished and were complaining that they were waiting on the House... but when it comes time for them to move...


"We'll move something when we're satisfied that it's sound policy," he added.


OK, you do that.


Meanwhile, the Democrats got the job done in a way that will work to preserve the budget and let us move on from this mess. If the Senate wants to obstruct at this point, they can go tell the business community why it all fell apart.


See ya next week.

Read more...

Bishop under recall threat

Here's a new twist for you. From the AP-


Add Senate Majority Leader Mike Bishop of Rochester to the list of possible recall targets.


The chairman of the Oakland County Democratic Party says he soon will file paperwork to start a recall attempt against Bishop, the Legislature's top Republican.


The reason?


Bishop may be targeted because he has supported spending cuts and voted to repeal a services tax without replacement revenue attached.


Recalls like this are a waste of time. I've said it before, I'll say it again- no one should be recalled over this, no, not even Mike Bishop, or the pig man wins and nothing ever gets done. True malfeasance of office? OK. But not tax votes.


Now, if we wanted to look at simple obstruction of all the OTHER stuff the Senate has ignored this year... or the fact that the MRP is using recalls purely for partisan purposes and we need to make a point about that...


No, not even then. But it sure is fun to think about.

Read more...

Thursday, November 08, 2007

Granholm calls for renewable energy portfolio standard

Today the Governor was in Detroit meeting with various companies that are working in alternative energy, and afterwards she had this to say-


After hosting a round-table discussion with alternative energy companies in downtown Detroit this morning, she called for Michigan to join 25 other states in adopting a so-called renewable energy portfolio standard -- which would require a certain amount of energy used in the state to come from renewable sources such as wind, solar and biomass.


"We have the assets to be a leader in this sector," she said. "The fact that we don't have the policy is really unfortunate."


The lack of policy is on the mind of business, too. Yesterday in Grand Rapids, another group of business leaders called for a REPS for the state.


A select group of manufacturers and educators attending the event at Cascade Engineering on Wednesday said the state needs legislation mandating power providers to get more electricity from renewable resources. Lack of the law, called a renewable portfolio standard, is chilling investment in the state's nascent industry.


Granholm told them to get together and bug those lawmakers. GR Mayor George Heartwell knows the score on that one.


When Heartwell complained state legislators were "bumbling along" on the badly needed renewable energy standard, Granholm challenged the mayor and the region's manufacturers to pressure the Legislature to back such a bill.


"It's easier to get to 100 percent renewable energy," Heartwell said with a laugh.


Probably true, but that doesn't mean you shouldn't try. After all, there is already legislation sitting there, just waiting to be acted on.


Enter Senator Jim Barcia, who is sponsoring such a bill, and wrote about it here back in August.


Recent studies suggest that implementing a modest RPS could lead to the creation of thousands of jobs, and would help to keep a portion of the more than $18 billion annually we spend on out-of-state energy sources here in Michigan. 


I believe that a mandated standard of 13% by 2015 and 20% by 2020 will create jobs in Michigan and help turn our economy around. By passing an aggressive renewable standard we will be sending a signal to manufacturers of renewable generation equipment that Michigan is serious about renewable energy.


Create thousands of jobs. Save money. Make money. Revitalize and diversify Michigan's economy. Be the leader in an exploding field that has both nationwide and global demand.


Hmmmm. The benefits to Michigan are glaringly obvious. Now, why do you suppose that Senate Republicans won't act on this legislation?

Read more...

Dems back on the ballot?

Can they do this? I guess so. MIRS is reporting that the Senate put the Fleeing Four- Biden, Obama, Richardson and Edwards, back on the Jan. 15th primary ballot, and put the language of the voter lists in a separate bill. 


The fix also would allow, at the request of the major party chairs, Secretary of State Terri Lynn LAND to remove candidates who have dropped out of the race. Under the old law, such candidates including Kansas U.S. Sen. Sam BROWNBACK, had to remain on the ballot. The model of adding and removing candidates is based on a model in use in the State of Florida.


House may vote on this tonight. The House may also vote on the repeal/replace of the service tax, which passed out of committee earlier today. This one comes from Gongwer-


On a 11-2-3 vote, the House Tax Policy Committee has approved a bill placing

32.9 percent surcharge on the Michigan Business Tax in 2008 in exchange for repealing the service tax before it begins December 1.


Although the Legislature is under the gun to deal with the service tax quickly so businesses can avoid implementation costs, it was not immediately clear after the committee vote whether the House still plans to vote on the bill later in the day, the last scheduled session day before a two-week break. The Senate would not be able to take up the measure if it chose to until five days after the House acts.


All I know is Rick Albin was on at 6, looking like someone had taken away his puppy, and telling us that he had to spend yet another long night in Lansing, you big meanies you.


I'm going to watch Al Gore on 30 Rock and I'll catch up with this in the morning. Good luck everyone!

Read more...

Wednesday, November 07, 2007

Small Step, Big Change

As you know, the Governor is spending this month meeting with companies across the state that are involved in the advancement of alternative energy. Jobs and money for the state, reducing our dependence on oil, clean and renewable energy, it's all good on the grand scale. The trick has always been to translate the "big picture" down to the personal and look at the ways this will benefit you in your daily life, and, the greatest motivator of all, your bank account. 


Yesterday, JenniferGranholm.com put up a page called "smallstepbigchange.org" with highlights of the meetings and the reasons why they are happening, and it includes a link to a list of the small things that you can do at home to help reduce your environmental impact.


Did you ever take the Earth Day Footprint quiz? Based on those (very) loose calculations, it would take 9.3 planets to support my current lifestyle- and I really don't consume that much. I never fly, I don't drive around a lot, but that is only because my car in ancient and I don't push it if I don't have to. I think most of my consumption on that quiz is based on the size of my house and the fact that I am a big-time carnivore who eats processed food because I don't like cooking or growing my own food.


So, I go look at the small list at smallstepbigchange and instantly I felt a twinge of guilt as I thought about the things that I should be doing- and things that I must do this winter out of pure economic survival alone.


See the news last night? See the price of oil and the costs of home heating fuel going right through the roof again? Ultimately that will be the thing that forces us to change our ways. We will conserve whether we want to or not. Sad that it takes that kind of pressure to make it all personal- but it does.


Let's play true confessions and go down that list.


Replace the light bulbs in my home with compact fluorescent bulbs. Yes, I will do that. Have been thinking about it for awhile. During the summer when it stays light until 10 or so, I didn't have the need for much indoor lighting. Besides, if I'm not in front of the computer, I'm in front of the TV, and I do both of those things in the dark most of the time. Now that it is getting darker earlier, I will check on compact bulbs.


Have my tire pressure and my air filter checked every time I change my oil. I have a very slow leak in my back left tire, so I check my pressure frequently when I notice it getting soft again. The air filter I should change soon- and here is a hint, buy those at the store and do it yourself. The oil change places charge an arm and a leg for them.


Look for the 'Energy Star' label when I buy new kitchen appliances. If I was in the market for such things, I would. But, I'm hoping the ones I have now will last because I really can't afford any new appliances at this point. I would love to get an energy efficient furnace too. The furnace in this house is well over 30 years old- runs great, but probably not energy efficient. (I also have a coal room in the basement. I can't imagine what it was like to have to feed a coal furnace. Life is better now than the 1920's.)


Only run the dishwasher when it's full and I won't use the heat dry option. Done and done. And I don't run it very often (see "no cooking" above).


Weatherize my home with caulk and weather strips. This is the biggee. I have a two story, three-bedroom house, insulation is pretty good, but the windows are not sealed. Over 1800 square feet. Last year, the heat bills ran well over $350 in the winter months, and now I hear that natural gas is expected to rise another 10%.


I did do some weatherization last year, but not enough. This year I am going to caulk, and plastic the windows where I can, and shut off the extra two bedrooms. The house is too big for just me, bought in another time, another life where I thought I would need this space, but things changed and now I don't. But, right now is not a good time to sell for obvious reasons, so I'm stuck here for the time being, and I must button it up this winter.


Take advantage of the recycling programs in my community. Done. Grand Rapids has free curbside recycling, and I have been doing this for years now.


Lower my thermostat by just 2 degrees this winter. See above, and, already done. I keep it at 65 and dress warm. Back in my old apartment I used to keep it at 72 (I hate being cold), but that isn't possible in this barn. One thing I want to check also this year is a programmable thermostat.


So, what am I missing here? Any other things that we should be doing? Small things in our daily lives that help save the environment, and save money at the same time? If you have any suggestions or things that you do, put them in the comments!

Read more...

Judge blocks Michigan's Jan. 15th primary

Breaking on the Detroit News- it's back to the drawing board.


An Ingham County Circuit Court judge today ruled that Michigan's Jan. 15 presidential primary cannot be held.


Judge William Collette said the contest is unconstitutional because it allocated public money to be used for a private purpose, which would require a two-thirds vote of the legislature. The law passed this summer establishing the contest didn't pass by a two-thirds vote.


"Clearly there's an injury to the public interest," said Collette.


At issue are lists with the names of voters who take part in the Jan 15 balloting. Under the law, voters would have to request one ballot or the other, and the Republican and Democratic parties would take sole ownership of the lists of who voted in each contest.


This will be appealed by those fighting for the primary. Stay tuned...

Read more...

Senate votes to change future lawmaker pay and benefits

Not now... later. We can't touch the current crop.


Bills that could be approved as early as Wednesday by the full Senate would set up a system where lawmakers elected after this year get a percentage of their health care paid for based on the number of years worked. The bills would not affect current legislators.


Future lawmakers would have to work 14 years to get the same level of coverage at 55 that current lawmakers now get in six years.


The Senate Government Operations and Reform Committee also passed a resolution calling for cutting lawmakers' pay by 5 percent, and limiting future pay hikes to the inflation rate.


That proposal would require action by the State Officers Compensation Committee to take effect. The committee isn't scheduled to meet until 2009, however, so the earliest lawmakers could see salary cuts is 2011. Lawmakers earn $79,650 a year, and legislative leaders make more.


As we have pointed out before, Michigan lawmakers earn well above the national average, and a 5% cut doesn't do much to change that fact. But don't tell that to Nancy "Right to Work for Less and Kill the EITC, too" Cassis. Her buying power has been severely curtailed by inflation, you know.


Cue the violins. From Gongwer-


And Sen. Nancy Cassis (R-Novi) said that since legislative salaries were boosted by 38 percent - to their current $79,650 (legislative leaders are paid more and legislators are also allowed up to $12,000 in expenses) in 2002 - inflation has eroded the buying power of those salaries by 17 percent.


I'll give you a moment to dry your tears.


OK. Moving on, Bruce Patterson had this to say-


If the two bills are enacted then that would be a reduction in legislative compensation, and Sen. Bruce Patterson (R-Canton) said, "It seems to me we would have trouble attracting the best and brightest without adequate compensation."


Bruce is right. If $79,000 a year only gets us the likes of Bruce Patterson, just how much would we have to pay to attract someone who is bright? Food for thought.


Dan Farough, executive director of Progress Michigan, is trying to keep them honest. Best of luck, Dan.


The group Progress Michigan, which has been leading an effort to force reductions in legislative salaries and retirement benefits, charged that the two bills and the resolution effectively protect legislative perks.


Dan Farough of Progress Michigan said the measures would still mean the taxpayers are paying the bulk of the cost of health insurance for retired legislators. And the change to the resolution means lawmakers could count on future salary increases, Mr. Farough said.


The action is a "slap in the face to every Michigan family struggling to keep a roof over their heads and food on the table," Mr. Farough said. Lawmakers should lead by example and enact measures that cut their benefits, he said.


But if our lawmakers weren't slapping us in the face on a daily basis, would we recognize them?

Read more...

Senate votes to repeal service tax without replacement

Really? Are they going to take back the votes on MESSA too? That was part of the bargain, after all.


As expected, the Michigan Senate voted 23-15 on Wednesday to repeal a tax on more business services set to take effect Dec. 1.


Republicans who control the Senate supported the bill as a step forward while Democrats said they could not back it unless the lost tax revenue is replaced, because the money is part of a deal to balance state government's budget.


No way it gets past the Governor, or even the House, but that won't stop the Republicans from being fiscally irresponsible. Mike Prusi calls them out on it-


Democrats, however, argued there also is agreement to replace the tax _ as shown by bipartisan votes last week to spend the money it would generate.


"It's the reasonable and responsible thing to do," said Sen. Michael Prusi, an Ishpeming Democrat who accused Republicans of playing "gotcha" politics by rushing to pass the bill and seeking credit for it instead of first reaching an overall deal.


Not only that, they knew the House would remove the tie-bar on the two separate bills, one that delays the start and the other that was the repeal. Senate Republicans would have no such action. Does this signal an obstruction on replacement revenue?


Republicans blocked Democrats' efforts to tie the repeal to a bill Democrats said is being worked on in the House that would replace revenue lost from killing the service tax.


The House is shooting for sanity.


House Tax Policy Chairman Steven Bieda said Wednesday he hopes to vote Thursday on legislation repealing the tax and replacing the revenue. The Warren Democrat's committee has been mulling whether to add a surcharge to the new Michigan Business Tax to make up the lost revenue.


So, Republicans will take credit for the things the budget saved and provided for their communities, and then they will take credit for repealing the funds that pay for them. Nice.

Read more...

Tuesday, November 06, 2007

NFL Week 9 Results


Tennessee 20, Carolina 7


Buffalo 33, Cincinnati 21


Detroit 44, Denver 7


Green Bay 33, Kansas City 22


New Orleans 41, Jacksonville 24


Minnesota 35, San Diego 17


Atlanta 20, San Francisco 16


Washington 23, N.Y. Jets 20 (OT)


Tampa Bay 17, Cardinals 10


Cleveland 33, Seattle 30 (OT)


Houston 24, Oakland 17


New England 24, Indianapolis 20


Dallas 38, Philadelphia 17


Pittsburgh 38, Baltimore 7



10-4. 85-45 overall.


Read more...

Clearly, it's time for another vacation

A hat tip to the LSJ for the title of this post, a take-off of a phrase they published back in July when the media pitched a fit over the two-week break our lawmakers took when the '08 budget was still up in the air.


You know, that summer break, the one where they promised that talks were happening and they would get this budget done in time and they just HAD to get back to their districts and talk to those constituents that they couldn't possibly talk to on Mondays and Fridays of every other week in the year and besides they never REALLY take any vacations, honest, ever, except for all those times that they, uh, did.


Not like they would shutdown the government or anything, right? Nah. Not them.


Well, this time they can't, but the Republicans sure can continue the pattern of obstruction and delay they have established as the hallmark of their legislative body of work this year.


How could they possibly do this yet again, you ask? For starters, pull some major flip-flops on the pressing issue of the day- this time it's the service taxes; that issue the Republicans screwed up in the first place, that issue that they said they wouldn't revisit just a few weeks ago. That one. Watch them try to blow it all up.


Listen to Nancy Cassis change her tune on this in less than a week. 


Cassis said she would replace it with higher business levies elsewhere to make up the $750 million it is estimated to generate in a full year.


The tax goes "so wide and so deep, it would hurt businesses of almost every size in the state," she said, but "we really need to look at close to a revenue-neutral replacement as possible."


Presto chango, just like that, hey Rocky, watch me pull a rabbit out of my hat- here is what Nancy had to say yesterday.


Senate Finance Committee chairperson Nancy Cassis, R-Novi, said the Legislature should repeal the services tax and revisit the just-passed 2007-08 budget to find ways to cut. Not only that, she said the Legislature should revisit the new business tax to correct what she called its unfairness to many businesses.


"You only have one time to get this right," she said.


In Senate Republican speak, "one time" apparently means "many times". They already have had months to "get this right". They spent all year promising us they would do just that. Now they want to open up two major deals, the '08 budget and the MBT, and see if they can obstruct everything all over again.


And they will do it just as soon as they get back from their third two-week vacation of the year. Sad thing is, they are running out of time to take more vacations, but they sure aren't running out of excuses to justify them. They just keep dusting off the old ones.


relive all the fun again over the flip...
Mike Bishop had something to say about the time off, of course. Does this sound familiar?


"Our members will be back in the district working hard for the most part. Some have planned family vacations and the Legislature has been in session for some time now and working quite hard. There are times when the Legislature actually takes time off from the legislative portion of our work, and we go back to the district and do what we do best, which is represent the people we're elected by."


Marsden has done a great job of coaching on that canned answer. Yes, Mike, you do a swell job of representing us. The praise you have received this year from the people and the press has been glowing, hasn't it? Are ya feelin' the love out here?


To be fair- they are planning to have "special sessions" if a deal can be reached. Just like all those "special sessions" in August, or September, or whenever it was they whined about having to work, they are willing to sacrifice themselves once again, so be grateful.


Bishop said there's a possibility that special session days may be scheduled during the break to consider a service tax repeal and replacement plan. Senate Republicans also may consider scheduling tentative session days for next week in case there's a plan before them. "There's not a plan in place to replace the service tax yet and until we have a legitimate plan it makes no sense to talk about emergency deadlines," he said.


If Cassis has her way, there won't be any legitimate plans, obviously. Maybe they do want to take this to a ballot proposal so Brooks will have an excuse to hang around and be a nuisance to everyone for a full year.


Even the irrelevant House Republicans want to get in on this act, but once again they contradict the Senate. Dave Agema (R- Grandville), the guy who missed all the shutdown shenanigans because he was on a three week Siberian hunting trip, quite possibly outdid Mike Bishop in the arrogance department with this next statement. Mike, you have competition!


"In my opinion, the Legislature has been taking a break since March," Agema said.


"I think we ought to stay in and do what we need to do. If we go past opening day (of hunting season), so be it."




Yeah. So sayeth the Republican who already had his hunting vacation. So be it.


It won't be it, though, because it never is it, they never will have this done, and nothing else will ever get done, either, because after they come back from Thanksgiving break, they are scheduled out December 6th for Christmas break. Bet they need that time so those grateful constituents can shower them with lavish parties and gifts for all that hard vacationing they have done all year.


Can't wait to see how the Republicans spend all of next year delaying the next big screw-up. Maybe Santa will bring them a fresh set of excuses.

Read more...

Fire up the ballot proposal for stem cell research

Might as well just get started on putting that together for '08. Legislation to change our laws on stem cell research are going nowhere in the Senate, according to Tom George (R-Kalamazoo), chair of the Senate Health Policy Committee.


Andy Meisner and Mark Meadows have sponsored legislation in the House that will allow researchers to create stem cell lines and increase penalties for cloning. A hearing is set for tomorrow morning. Meisner expects the bills to pass, but George indicates the Senate will obstruct. From MIRS-


Even if the bills arrive in the Senate, George, one of two physicians in the Senate and the chair of the Senate Health Policy Committee, said he doesn't expect them to survive.


"I don't think it's going through the Senate," George said.


George considers the legislation insignificant because Michigan labs researching stem cells can purchase more from out of state if necessary.


Sure they could. Heck, they could just do it all out of state. We have already explored the ways that these restrictive laws are costing Michigan jobs and money.


Jack Lessenberry has a great essay today that points out the insanity of letting one extreme faction control the destiny of this issue. Make sure you go read that- and follow over the flip for a few excerpts...

Our future is being held hostage by Right to Life of Michigan, a group which wants to do for medical progress what the Inquisition did for freedom of thought. We are one of the most backward states in the union when it comes to embryonic stem cell research.


Nobody is as backward as we are except North and South Dakota, Louisiana and Arkansas. That's right. Alabama and Mississippi are more enlightened than we are on what scientists generally agree is the most promising medical frontier.


The thought of Alabama and Mississippi being more enlightened than Michigan ought to send chills up your spine, unless, of course, you can't feel your spine. This research might help with that, and just think, we could be doing that research right here in Michigan, leading the way in the nation on cures for debilitating disease and attracting investment and the jobs of the future.


Embryonic stem cell research holds the potential to develop cures for disease, including Parkinson's, diabetes and macular degeneration. Even cautious scientists believe that in time and after experimentation, they may be able to use stem cells and a process called Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer to regenerate damaged nervous systems. What that means is that people with severe spinal cord injuries may be able someday to get up and walk.


What you would think is that government at every level should be pouring billions into this research. Yet we can't do it at all in Michigan. That's because of religious fanatics who think it violates the sanctity of human life. They want you to think that the scientists want to destroy human life to do this research.


George actually has a more obscure reference than that, so obscure that you can't really follow his line of thinking here. What does this mean exactly?


Allowing Michigan researchers to convert human embryos into stem cell lines is no more likely to lead to medical breakthroughs than creating rubber tree plantations will lead to more automobile manufacturers, said Sen. Tom George.


And that comes from a doctor. Amazing.


Lessenberry sums it up for us.


What we need, and deserve, is a statewide vote on whether to allow embryonic stem cell research.


Our future is at stake, in every possible way.



As we have seen this year, the legislators in Michigan give no thought to our future, only to pleasing the special interests that control them today. It would be nice to see these bills pass, and there is still hope that it may happen, but chances are we will have to take this one to the voters next November.

Read more...

Monday, November 05, 2007

Granholm cuts spending, McManus is baffled

Going through the budgets, cutting some things here and there, you would think that the Republicans would be happy about that, right? Wasn't that what they complained about all year long, that "out of control" government spending?


Gov. Jennifer Granholm has signed most of the new state budget bills, but she also has rejected portions through several line-item vetoes announced today.


Various research projects were cut. Payments were scaled back. But touch something that would benefit a Republican district...


In other vetoes, the Democratic governor rejected about $1 million in funding that would have assisted forestry programs in soil conservation districts. The conservation district funding affects both the Department of Agriculture and the Department of Natural Resources.


Sen. Michelle McManus, R-Lake Leelanau, said she was "baffled and frustrated" by Granholm's veto. Supporters say conservation districts must continue to expand their roles to meet more diverse environmental challenges.


Yes. Yes, they should. But you know what? They need money to do that. This stuff doesn't happen for free.


Since we don't see McManus being targeted by the big pink pig, chances are Michelle didn't offer to help pay for that funding. You're shocked, I know.


Peter Luke had a great column yesterday about the hypocrisy of the House Republicans; perhaps we need to look at a few Senate Republicans, too.


Lawmakers who took credit for voting against the service tax -- even though the narrow margin on which it passed is fueling recall efforts against their colleagues -- can go home and claim credit for being true to their schools.


Only reluctantly last week did House Speaker Andy Dillon, D-Redford Twp., call such inconsistency among these lawmakers a tad hypocritical.


But having your cake and eating it too is always a preferred method of legislating.


Any other Republicans want to complain about the vetoes? Anyone?


Didn't think so.

Read more...

Voting tomorrow? Bring your ID

New rules take effect tomorrow. Last time I voted, I talked with my local polling place people about checking IDs and they are NOT thrilled about this, but, they gotta do what they gotta do. From smilin' Terri Lynn Land-


Starting with this election, voters will be asked to present photo identification. Photo ID includes a Michigan driver's license, state-issued personal ID card, or other acceptable form of ID.


"The voter ID requirement simply adds another layer of protection against fraud and ensures the integrity of our elections," said Land. "However, the law recognizes that not everyone will have an acceptable photo ID. That means voters without photo ID will still be able to vote."


Voters who do not have photo ID with them at the polls can sign an affidavit attesting to that fact, and they will then receive a ballot that will be counted with all others.


And if anyone hassles you- be sure and complain.


Tomorrow shouldn't be too much of a problem, but in '08 this will be a nightmare.


Also, if you live in Grand Rapids 75th district, here is a heads up- the recall language on Robert Dean was approved today, and you may see petition hawkers outside your polling place. If you do, be sure and contact the Kent County Democrats. From the Democratic Edge-


Immediately report any signature gathering. This is key - we need to know where they are at so that we can have a volunteer out there telling Grand Rapids voters the truth about this recall effort.


If you see any recall activity such as people collecting signatures, please contact Sue Levy at 616-745-2703 or the Kent Dems office at 616-406-1573 immediately (plug those numbers into your cell phones or keep them with you in your wallet/purse).


I know where they were hanging out on the SBT last year, and I will be checking those places tomorrow and making some calls if I see them again. Please do the same if you are in the GR area!

Read more...

Sunday, November 04, 2007

Hope for the Michigan economy

By now you have heard that the UAW and Ford came to agreement on a new contract yesterday, and, as with the deals made with GM and Chrysler, the major components are shifting the health/retiree benefits into the hands of the unions and creating a two-tier wage system. How both of those things will work in practice remains to be seen, but the general tone coming out of the industry indicates that these contracts might be the thing that will make the Big Three competitive again- and that is good news for Michigan.


As much as the doom-criers love to blame our state government for Michigan's woes, the truth is the auto industry still is the number one factor in our economic engine, to cin a phrase. Dana Johnson, chief economist from Comerica-


The problems are concentrated here because of Michigan's dependence on the auto industry. Without the last few years of auto-related layoffs, buyouts, bankruptcies and downsizings, the state economy would be as healthy as any other in the Midwest.


"Virtually 100 percent of the underperformance of the Michigan economy is due to the direct impact of this restructuring in the auto business," Johnson said.


And David Cole, shortly after the deal with GM-


"Our problem in the state is almost totally auto related," said David Cole, chairman of the Center for Automotive Research in Ann Arbor. "In terms of things inside the industry, this labor agreement was the final major piece."


The restructuring of the auto industry will still produce fallout through next year, as evidenced by Chrysler's announcement of 12,000 job cuts this week. We aren't done yet, and there will be more pain to come, but will these contracts be the catalyst that starts us on the way back up? John Gallagher from the Free Press, Oct. 28th-


Those potential positives go beyond profitable domestic automakers to include stronger real estate values, increased political clout and a leading role for Michigan in fighting global warming by creating the energy-saving, greener cars of tomorrow.


It also could mean a renewed strength and purpose for the UAW and other unions as they take on more of the burden of managing health care.


True, the experts hedge, waffle and dodge when asked for specific predictions. But there's a growing consensus that 2007 -- the year of new UAW contracts, a falling dollar that helps U.S. manufacturers and the rebirth of Chrysler as part of private-equity Cerberus Capital Management -- is the long-awaited turning point for the economically ailing state.


Predicting economic performance will always be an inexact science of course; there are too many things outside of our control that can happen on the national and global stage to say for certain that we will get out of the woods based on just the auto industry- and, if we have learned anything in the past few years, it's that we need to stop relying solely on the auto industry as the answer to our problems.


Sure, they will always be a big part of our state's economy, and we want them to be a big part of our state's economy- but we need to diversify.


And we need to start now.


More over the flip...
Looming in the background, heard uttered more frequently in news reports of late, are the words "national recession"- and that has the potential to derail the progress that we are making. Auto sales drop again, and we will be headed for bigger trouble. All the balanced state budgets and competitive auto contracts won't mean a thing in the face of that, but, they sure will help deflect the impact should it occur.


If the national housing crisis and credit crunch continues to spread, the U.S. economy would weaken and might even drop into a recession. In that case, Michigan's automakers would be forced to cut even deeper, noted Don Grimes, a professor at the University of Michigan's Institute of Labor and Industrial Relations.


"The risk is if we really get a downturn in auto sales," Grimes said. Current total U.S. auto sales are expected to stay between 16.5 million and 17 million vehicles, he says, but a stricken national economy would cut that number quite a bit.


"I've seen estimates that put sales down in the 15 million range next year," Grimes said. "If they fall off that way, we could get hit again."


The answer? Diversify.


Jobs are going begging now. We focus on the high unemployment in Michigan, but we are ignoring the fields that are growing and looking for workers.


At the same time, Michigan has been adding lots of new jobs in several non-automotive fields, including health care, education and tourism. Some fields, like nursing, are growing fast enough to suffer serious shortages of workers.




Makes you wish we had started investing years ago doesn't it? Still, we have the tools to start now, if we are wise enough to pick them up and use them. The No Worker Left Behind program and others like it can help fill these jobs with the training they provide. College education will still be the crucial factor.


The new state budget didn't cut education funding, thankfully, and overall it will certainly help put us on solid ground, perhaps paving the way for future education investment as we get the house in order.


Mitch Bean, director of the House Fiscal Agency, said the state's finances are on their strongest footing in nearly a decade, but he cautioned a national economic downturn could unravel everything.


"Nobody can look at this budget and say it's not structurally sound, because it is," he said.


And our tax rates are still competitive for business and entrepreneurs, as evidenced by a new study that ranks us 6th in the nation as a "business friendly" state in the terms of a place to look to start your new venture.


In essence, it is a comparative measure of economic incentives relating to government policies: the lower the "Small Business Survival Index" number, the greater the incentives to invest and take risks in that particular state.




So, all the pieces are there. We are setting a strong foundation. A healthy auto industry, combined with educating our workers, investing in new growth industries such as alternative energy, high-tech manufacturing and especially health care, and a state fiscal climate that provides for its citizens at the same time it encourages new business ventures, and we are certainly can be on our way to prosperity again.


The one thing we have to hope for is that we avoid a national recession now. Keep those fingers crossed, say your prayers, and work your mojo, whatever it takes. We will get there yet.

Read more...

NFL Week 9



(OPEN DATES: Chicago, Miami, NY Giants, St. Louis)



San Francisco at Atlanta


Cincinnati at Buffalo


Denver at Detroit


Green Bay at Kansas City


San Diego at Minnesota


Jacksonville at New Orleans


Washington at NY Jets


Arizona at Tampa Bay


Carolina at Tennessee


Seattle at Cleveland


New England at Indianapolis (dis is gonna be gooood)


Houston at Oakland


Dallas at Philadelphia


Baltimore at Pittsburgh

Read more...

Saturday, November 03, 2007

Expect override of Bush veto on water bill

Baby's first override. Make sure you take a picture for the scrapbook.


President George W. Bush today vetoed legislation authorizing more than $20 billion in water projects, setting the stage for a congressional override on a measure that enjoyed wide bipartisan support.


The Water Resources Development Act vetoed by Bush today is of particular importance to Michigan, as it authorizes a barrier to the invasive Asian Carp entering the Great Lakes, provides money for dredging and opens the way to a new super-sized lock to be built at Sault Ste. Marie.


A few other things of importance to Michigan- $3 million for shoreline protection along Detroit River, $20 million to clean up pollution in the St. Clair River and Lake St. Clair, and $35 million to fix sewage overflows that kill fish and force beach closings.


For the rest of the country, such things as coastal and wetlands protections, money for restoration of the Florida Everglades, locks on the Mississippi and Illinois rivers, hurricane mitigation down south and, last but certainly not least, 100 year levee protection for the city of New Orleans.


This veto is expected to be overridden as early as next week.


The $23 billion water bill passed in both chambers of Congress by well more than the two-thirds majority needed to override a veto and make the bill law.


Bush objected to the $9 billion in projects added during negotiations between the House and Senate. He hoped that his action, even though it is sure not to hold, would cast him as a friend to conservatives who demand a tighter rein on federal spending.


But Bush never vetoed spending bills under the Republican Congress, despite budgetary increases then, too. Attempting to demonstrate fiscal toughness in the seventh year of his presidency, Bush risks being criticized for doing too little, too late and of waging a transparently partisan attack against the Democrats who now run Capitol Hill.


"Transparently partisan attacks" are the hallmark of the Bush presidency, but this time he hit a bunch of Republicans too. All Michigan members of Congress voted for this bill. It passed the House 381-40, and the Senate, 81-12. Overwhelming bipartisan support.


Apparently this is the way it will have to be to get any sort of domestic spending through. Let's hope this is the first override of many to follow.

Read more...

Friday, November 02, 2007

Senate Republicans are responsible for service taxes

Does Mike Bishop ever tell the truth? Seriously. We need to know the answer to that question.


Not only was he busted on the infamous "agreement" to raise taxes from the last budget showdown, now he is trying to spin the service tax problem as "the baby" of Governor Granholm. From Gongwer-


The Senate action was the capper to a day that began with Senate Majority Leader Mike Bishop (R-Rochester), during a taping of Michigan Public Television's "Off the Record", saying the services tax is the baby of Governor Jennifer Granholm - not Senate Republicans - and that it should be she who puts together a solution to replace the measure if she now says there are problems with it.


Um, first of all, she isn't the one having problems with it, Mike, your fan club is, and second of all, we have Andy Dillon on tape telling us that the Senate Republicans are responsible for this. From Off The Record on Oct. 5th, Andy was asked if he could see revisiting the service tax issue-


Dillon: The answer is yes. Even with the MBT, we knew we had cleanup after the fact. But, one of my frustrations is, I went to the chamber that first weekend we came in, about three weeks before the deadline, and I asked them, I said, "Help me with 4.6, because you're not going to like what you see if it's less than 4.6".


So... they claimed that they were helping, but they didn't deliver any votes for me. So when the Senate pushed it down from 4.6 to 4.3, then the tax on services list grew and expanded and now people are unhappy, but, you know, I saw this coming three weeks ago.


Andy goes on to explain that some businesses were over-estimating the impact of their liability under the new tax, and the Treasury Dept. was helping them out with that. When they realized it wasn't as bad as they thought, they calmed down.


Skubick then asked about raising the income tax as a solution. Dillon told us "you can't rule anything out"- and then he told the story of how it all played out the night of the shutdown.


Dillon: Nine o'clock Sunday night, a group came down the hallway of the Capitol, to me, saying, let's go to 4.7 or 4.75, I said, give me a half hour. I brought in House Fiscal, I brought in the Senate, and I concluded that we would face shutdown then, because 4.7, 4.75, you had to look at exemptions, you had to re-do the rollback, the sunset, and I just thought that we wouldn't be able to get there in time.


So Andy did consider it, and was willing to try, but the clock ran out due to weeks of Senate indecision.


Dillon: It was frustrating because I had been saying for weeks, you know, the lower you go on income, the bigger problem you are going to have on the tax on services. So, I did tell Senator Bishop that I'm open-minded after the fact, but let's not shut government down tonight.


Later in the month, Rep. Tim Melton said the same thing. From MIRS-


On other subjects, Melton suggested that House Democrats are open to altering the newly enacted state sales tax on services, but any changes must originate in the Senate.


"They need to own this," Melton argued. "It's their fault we have the sales tax."


He said that the House Democrats "never wanted this in the first place" and always favored a higher income tax rate. It was only at the 11th hour, as the state neared a government shutdown, that Republicans wanted to substitute the sales tax with the higher income tax level. By then, House Speaker Andy DILLON (D-Redford Twp.) concluded there was not enough time to redo the income tax rate.


So when you hear Mike trying to pass the buck (and in last night's MIRS he was whining about "minority status" and how he was practically forced into doing this)- now you know the story of how it happened.


As much as Bishop and Co. want to blame the Democrats or the Governor for, well, everything, the truth always finds its way to the surface.

Read more...

Thursday, November 01, 2007

Senate votes to delay service taxes

Can't turn your back for two seconds on these guys.


Moments ago the Senate voted 22-14 to delay and/or repeal the new service taxes that we talked about earlier today. Breaking on MIRS-


The Michigan Senate moments ago passed (22-14) legislation that would delay the implementation date of the use tax on services from Dec. 1 to Dec. 20. 


That delay in implementation is contained in SB 845. The Senate is also expected to tie-bar that bill to SB 838 which would repeal the new tax.


If you are going to tie-bar a repeal, why the delay? Perhaps to replace it with something else? According to Mike Bishop, caught in a rare moment of lucidity, that is what they must do.


The Legislature's top Republican said Thursday the only realistic way to quickly and successfully repeal a tax on more business services is replacing the lost revenue.


"I don't think you can avoid that," said Senate Majority Leader Mike Bishop, R-Rochester. "The governor has been very clear about that, and we live in that reality."


Bishop's comments, made on public television's "Off the Record" show, contradicted other Republicans who believe the service tax can be killed off without a replacement. The tax is set to take effect Dec. 1, leaving little time for lawmakers to act.


Better run across the hall and talk to Craig if that is the case.


Brooks Patterson brought an army of landscapers to Lansing today to spread his message of good cheer all over the lawn. Go read if you need to hear what Brooks had to say, but if you know anything about Brooks, you can probably guess.


The Detroit News has more here.

Read more...

Just when you thought it was safe...

And here you thought the budget was done, finished, over, moving on now, yea, we don't have to listen to this anymore.


Not so fast there, bub. It's not over. It's never over. Not when there are Republicans around.


The House Republicans, who wouldn't vote for cuts, wouldn't vote for revenue, wouldn't do a darn thing except get in the way, but somehow DID find the will to vote to spend that money that other people negotiated, sweated, slaved over and put their careers on the line for, are now trying to screw this all up.


Yesterday, before the ink was even dry on the budget, House Republicans released a list of "cuts" in hopes of having an excuse to justify repealing the business service taxes.


While the House Tax Policy Committee will hold its first public hearing on the controversial 6 percent use tax on services Thursday, House Republicans Wednesday said they were introducing legislation that would repeal the tax and make more than enough cuts to the budget to cover for the $614 million loss in revenue.


Check these "cuts" on some big ticket items - once again they use all the favorite Republican buzzwords to make you think they actually have some sort of responsible plan.




Michigan Business Tax transition windfall - $219.4 million. 

Reexamine state employee benefits  - $100 million.

Competitively bid corrections services- $50 million. 

Streamline the Department of Community Health - $92.8 million. 

Department of Human Services reform - $109.5 million. 

Stop new appropriations to 21st Century Jobs program - $75 million.




That MBT money seems to have been counted about three times over by now. Going to renegotiate all the state employee contracts? How can you tell what the savings will be there, and how long will that take? Bidding corrections services is no guarantee of saving money either. And to simply say "streamline" and "reform" health and human services for the sick and the poor probably means "throw them in the street". Also, Republicans are doing this under the guise of "creating jobs", so they want to stop the program that is doing just that. Sounds like a plan.


None of this stuff flies with the Governor or the House Democrats, but the Republicans will waste our time with it anyway. Why? Already the Small Business Association is pointing to this as a solution. They have printed up 100,000 petitions to repeal the tax in hopes of getting it on the ballot next November.


Todd Anderson, SBA of Michigan's vice president for public policy, said that while he hopes the Legislature replaces the tax quickly, his group would likely move ahead to circulate petitions anyway -- because "it would give legislators more incentive to act."


-snip-


Anderson said he favors a plan outlined by House Republicans to make up for a tax repeal with just state spending cuts, although he added that position "is clearly in the minority."


All of this just sets the stage for what is to come next. Petitions, you say? The SBA has nothing on the master of disaster himself, the one, the only, give it up people and get ready for the return of the original petition-pusher himself... Brooks Patterson! (insert scary music here)


You knew he was out there, waiting to mess with us once again. Find out how, and what happened last time he did this, over the flip...
First of all, the Governor and Democrats are open to suggestions, with a few conditions.


"I am and have been in discussion with the business community about what that could look like. My criteria for the replacement are that it is revenue-neutral, and bipartisan and it's not temporary."


Bombastic Brooks begs to differ, and watch the wording.


Oakland County Executive L. Brooks Patterson is to kick off a petition drive today to repeal the levy, which expands the 6 percent sales tax on goods to a mix of services starting Dec. 1.


Patterson represents the business Coalition to Ax the Tax.


"She's wrong on all three points," Patterson said. "We should repeal it and not replace it with any new tax on business, because you can't tax your way to prosperity."


You can't cut your way to prosperity either.


You get the impression that the way Republicans and people like Brooks want to run their "business" is to hire uneducated workers, let the street in front of the store be full of potholes, let the building crumble around them, put faulty and unsafe products on the shelves, short staff the joint so there is no customer service, complain when the government doesn't help with all of the above, and then turn around and blame "taxes" when they can't succeed.


When Patterson talks about launching a petition drive, he's got Lansing's attention. Last year, he spearheaded a petition effort that collected more than 370,000 signatures to repeal the hated Single Business Tax, which had been the primary state commercial levy. Granholm had earlier vetoed legislation to wipe out the tax, but the petition drive allowed the Legislature to pass a veto-proof measure that scuttled the SBT.


And what happened there? He destroyed investment and job creation in the Detroit area for a full year.


Business growth in Metro Detroit -- new ventures and expansion of existing ones -- fell dramatically in the past 12 months compared to the previous year, reflecting the region's slumping economy and uncertainty for much of the year over the state's plans for a new business tax.


Do we let Brooks do this again? Probably not a wise idea. Go away Brooks.


Chances are this is all just bluster to get the lawmakers to do something, and do something fast. Not only do these new taxes kick in on December 1st, the utmost issue of importance to our Legislature is... vacation! Yes, they have yet another vacation starting soon, and we all know they won't want to miss that.


Senate Republicans hope to move on the issue next week, before the Legislature breaks Nov. 8 for deer-hunting season, which begins on Nov. 15.


"The uproar from the business community over this new tax is apparent and justified," said Matt Marsden, a spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Mike Bishop, R-Rochester. "We need to get working on this as quickly as possible. It will be our priority before the Nov. 8 break."


Yes, "priority" and "break" seem to always go together for the Senate Republicans. Kind of sums up the whole year for them. It would be nice to think that they could get this done in a week- the problem might lie in their own party's obstruction.


Isn't that a laugh. Or not.


Some have suggested Republicans might not want to work toward a replacement tax, in part because they could use it against Democrats in next year's elections. The service tax was passed with only a handful of Republican votes.


So, they will work on it, but they might obstruct themselves in the process.


Thankfully calmer heads are looking at this issue, and perhaps something will be worked out to the satisfaction of everyone, and they can all go on vacation just as soon as they fix all the mistakes it took them 10 months to make.


Stay tuned to the story that never ends...

Read more...

NFL Week 8 Results


Sorry so slow.


Cleveland 27, St. Louis 20


Detroit 16, Chicago 7


Indianapolis 31, Carolina 7


N.Y. Giants 13, Miami 10 (in London)


Tennessee 13, Oakland 9


Philadelphia 23, Minnesota 16


Pittsburgh 24, Cincinnati 13


Buffalo 13, N.Y. Jets 3


San Diego 35, Houston 10


Jacksonville 24, Tampa Bay 23.


New Orleans 31, San Francisco 10


New England 52, Washington 7


Green Bay 19, Denver 13 (OT)



11-2. (Thanks, O.) Damn those Jets! And, wow, Chicago really sucks.

75-41 for the year.

Read more...

About This Blog

Copyright 2009. All rights reserved.

  © Blogger templates The Professional Template by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP